Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in kvm_vcpu_write_guest_page
To:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        syzbot+ded1696f6b50b615b630@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        rkrcmar@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
References: <0000000000005de8da057a092ba2@google.com>
 <CAG_fn=Wmc+YU8BMcY_RXxAvVTpAMez5QUFyQSH3UsRg4Y-ZwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=pbonzini@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 xsEhBFRCcBIBDqDGsz4K0zZun3jh+U6Z9wNGLKQ0kSFyjN38gMqU1SfP+TUNQepFHb/Gc0E2
 CxXPkIBTvYY+ZPkoTh5xF9oS1jqI8iRLzouzF8yXs3QjQIZ2SfuCxSVwlV65jotcjD2FTN04
 hVopm9llFijNZpVIOGUTqzM4U55sdsCcZUluWM6x4HSOdw5F5Utxfp1wOjD/v92Lrax0hjiX
 DResHSt48q+8FrZzY+AUbkUS+Jm34qjswdrgsC5uxeVcLkBgWLmov2kMaMROT0YmFY6A3m1S
 P/kXmHDXxhe23gKb3dgwxUTpENDBGcfEzrzilWueOeUWiOcWuFOed/C3SyijBx3Av/lbCsHU
 Vx6pMycNTdzU1BuAroB+Y3mNEuW56Yd44jlInzG2UOwt9XjjdKkJZ1g0P9dwptwLEgTEd3Fo
 UdhAQyRXGYO8oROiuh+RZ1lXp6AQ4ZjoyH8WLfTLf5g1EKCTc4C1sy1vQSdzIRu3rBIjAvnC
 tGZADei1IExLqB3uzXKzZ1BZ+Z8hnt2og9hb7H0y8diYfEk2w3R7wEr+Ehk5NQsT2MPI2QBd
 wEv1/Aj1DgUHZAHzG1QN9S8wNWQ6K9DqHZTBnI1hUlkp22zCSHK/6FwUCuYp1zcAEQEAAc0f
 UGFvbG8gQm9uemluaSA8Ym9uemluaUBnbnUub3JnPsLBTQQTAQIAIwUCVEJ7AwIbAwcLCQgH
 AwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEH4VEAzNNmmxNcwOniaZVLsuy1lW/ntYCA0Caz0i
 sHpmecK8aWlvL9wpQCk4GlOX9L1emyYXZPmzIYB0IRqmSzAlZxi+A2qm9XOxs5gJ2xqMEXX5
 FMtUH3kpkWWJeLqe7z0EoQdUI4EG988uv/tdZyqjUn2XJE+K01x7r3MkUSFz/HZKZiCvYuze
 VlS0NTYdUt5jBXualvAwNKfxEkrxeHjxgdFHjYWhjflahY7TNRmuqPM/Lx7wAuyoDjlYNE40
 Z+Kun4/KjMbjgpcF4Nf3PJQR8qXI6p3so2qsSn91tY7DFSJO6v2HwFJkC2jU95wxfNmTEUZc
 znXahYbVOwCDJRuPrE5GKFd/XJU9u5hNtr/uYipHij01WXal2cce1S5mn1/HuM1yo1u8xdHy
 IupCd57EWI948e8BlhpujUCU2tzOb2iYS0kpmJ9/oLVZrOcSZCcCl2P0AaCAsj59z2kwQS9D
 du0WxUs8waso0Qq6tDEHo8yLCOJDzSz4oojTtWe4zsulVnWV+wu70AioemAT8S6JOtlu60C5
 dHgQUD1Tp+ReXpDKXmjbASJx4otvW0qah3o6JaqO79tbDqIvncu3tewwp6c85uZd48JnIOh3
 utBAu684nJakbbvZUGikJfxd887ATQRUQnHuAQgAx4dxXO6/Zun0eVYOnr5GRl76+2UrAAem
 Vv9Yfn2PbDIbxXqLff7oyVJIkw4WdhQIIvvtu5zH24iYjmdfbg8iWpP7NqxUQRUZJEWbx2CR
 wkMHtOmzQiQ2tSLjKh/cHeyFH68xjeLcinR7jXMrHQK+UCEw6jqi1oeZzGvfmxarUmS0uRuf
 fAb589AJW50kkQK9VD/9QC2FJISSUDnRC0PawGSZDXhmvITJMdD4TjYrePYhSY4uuIV02v02
 8TVAaYbIhxvDY0hUQE4r8ZbGRLn52bEzaIPgl1p/adKfeOUeMReg/CkyzQpmyB1TSk8lDMxQ
 zCYHXAzwnGi8WU9iuE1P0wARAQABwsEzBBgBAgAJBQJUQnHuAhsMAAoJEH4VEAzNNmmxp1EO
 oJy0uZggJm7gZKeJ7iUpeX4eqUtqelUw6gU2daz2hE/jsxsTbC/w5piHmk1H1VWDKEM4bQBT
 uiJ0bfo55SWsUNN+c9hhIX+Y8LEe22izK3w7mRpvGcg+/ZRG4DEMHLP6JVsv5GMpoYwYOmHn
 plOzCXHvmdlW0i6SrMsBDl9rw4AtIa6bRwWLim1lQ6EM3PWifPrWSUPrPcw4OLSwFk0CPqC4
 HYv/7ZnASVkR5EERFF3+6iaaVi5OgBd81F1TCvCX2BEyIDRZLJNvX3TOd5FEN+lIrl26xecz
 876SvcOb5SL5SKg9/rCBufdPSjojkGFWGziHiFaYhbuI2E+NfWLJtd+ZvWAAV+O0d8vFFSvr
 iy9enJ8kxJwhC0ECbSKFY+W1eTIhMD3aeAKY90drozWEyHhENf4l/V+Ja5vOnW+gCDQkGt2Y
 1lJAPPSIqZKvHzGShdh8DduC0U3xYkfbGAUvbxeepjgzp0uEnBXfPTy09JGpgWbg0w91GyfT
 /ujKaGd4vxG2Ei+MMNDmS1SMx7wu0evvQ5kT9NPzyq8R2GIhVSiAd2jioGuTjX6AZCFv3ToO
 53DliFMkVTecLptsXaesuUHgL9dKIfvpm+rNXRn9wAwGjk0X/A==
Message-ID: <9d2e26fb-1d2a-248f-5451-ee95d8a6c017@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:47:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=Wmc+YU8BMcY_RXxAvVTpAMez5QUFyQSH3UsRg4Y-ZwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 07/11/2018 13:10, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> This appears to be a real bug in KVM.
> Please see a simplified reproducer attached.

Thanks, I agree it's a reael bug.  The basic issue is that the
kvm_state->size member is too small (1040) in the KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE
ioctl, aka 0x4080aebf.

One way to fix it would be to just change kmalloc to kzalloc when
allocating cached_vmcs12 and cached_shadow_vmcs12, but really the ioctl
is wrong and should be rejected.  And the case where a shadow VMCS has
to be loaded is even more wrong, and we have to fix it anyway, so I
don't really like the idea of papering over the bug in the allocation.

I'll test this patch and submit it formally:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index c645f777b425..c546f0b1f3e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -14888,10 +14888,13 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;

-	/* Empty 'VMXON' state is permitted */
-	if (kvm_state->size < sizeof(kvm_state) + sizeof(*vmcs12))
+	/* Empty 'VMXON' state is permitted.  A partial VMCS12 is not.  */
+	if (kvm_state->size == sizeof(kvm_state))
 		return 0;

+	if (kvm_state->size < sizeof(kvm_state) + VMCS12_SIZE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (kvm_state->vmx.vmcs_pa != -1ull) {
 		if (kvm_state->vmx.vmcs_pa == kvm_state->vmx.vmxon_pa ||
 		    !page_address_valid(vcpu, kvm_state->vmx.vmcs_pa))
@@ -14917,6 +14920,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu,
 	}

 	vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*vmcs12) > VMCS12_SIZE);
 	if (copy_from_user(vmcs12, user_kvm_nested_state->data, sizeof(*vmcs12)))
 		return -EFAULT;

@@ -14932,7 +14936,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu,
 	if (nested_cpu_has_shadow_vmcs(vmcs12) &&
 	    vmcs12->vmcs_link_pointer != -1ull) {
 		struct vmcs12 *shadow_vmcs12 = get_shadow_vmcs12(vcpu);
-		if (kvm_state->size < sizeof(kvm_state) + 2 * sizeof(*vmcs12))
+		if (kvm_state->size < sizeof(kvm_state) + 2 * VMCS12_SIZE)
 			return -EINVAL;

 		if (copy_from_user(shadow_vmcs12,

Paolo