Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:18:36 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Piotr Bugalski <bugalski.piotr@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: Applied "spi: Add QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2" to the spi
 tree
Message-ID: <20181107151836.GB6809@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20181105103625.9644-6-bugalski.piotr@gmail.com>
 <20181107150327.B6DC41124E14@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181107150327.B6DC41124E14@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:03:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>=20
>    spi: Add QuadSPI driver for Atmel SAMA5D2
>=20
> has been applied to the spi tree at
>=20
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git=20

Sorry, I got confused about which patch series Boris had asked me to
apply for him - it wasn't this one!  Since the review looked like it was
just one minor issue last time I'll just leave them for now, they were
applied on a separate branch for sharing with the MTD tree so it's easy
for me to drop them if that's required or if I should put together the
pull request for MTD.  Sorry for any confusion this ends up causing,
it's entirely my mistake.

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlvjAkwACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9BDbQf9E18lZnH3x2dWbttEi5+uZ2JKiG2LDRupEP+Q+HQwKLvG0PZjZnTSYATF
w6PcSeKrdklNCUA7xJ9mRQRqSFle2GeAcz2q99C8chxIJwZRMSmtCLa6XXJnzk5U
VzraDwtWpdq30oaKVolnMMK7HhC5dizaOGzqmO/FXwm+5bg/btEUaflNKv4Fd+ky
aFwczzjLZqmifG04qb+FawwLM9a0QEztI4R6ExglYreyd9dIdd1v9PYlm4bL9vf9
WUjbjAENs1ROZAmNagR0FlObCzEWakEZzmj0j3XZrqS6cpJw+uySFJaAWk8J7F/a
sK7McZRulXT94oAXsv2STr5loc+1NQ==
=RV/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc--