Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266238AbUAGQQ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:16:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266242AbUAGQQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:16:53 -0500 Received: from ltgp.iram.es ([150.214.224.138]:45443 "EHLO ltgp.iram.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266238AbUAGQOA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:14:00 -0500 From: Gabriel Paubert Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:04:44 +0100 To: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: 2.4.23-BK9 and DC21142/3 Message-ID: <20040107160444.GA4723@iram.es> References: <20040102160640.GA3453@rdlg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040102160640.GA3453@rdlg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1796 Lines: 41 On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:06:41AM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > > I just installed 2.4.23-bk9 on a system with a ethernet card that > lscpi reports as DC21142 which is a quad port card. When the machine > came up it auto negotiated half duplex instead of full. On 2.4.21-ac4 > it negotiated Full. What driver are you using? I've had some similar problems recently and had to increase the autonegotiation timeout in a network driver to make the result of the autonegotiation stable, otherwise sometimes it would be HD sometimes FD. The reason was apparently that the driver would fall back to another method of determining the link speed and this other method limited itself to half duplex. I even seem to remember that it occasionally decided to fall back to 10Mb/s half duplex... It also may depend on the switches and the MII transceiver brand you use, the combinations I have now seems especially slow at autonegotiation. I have 2 sets of very similar systems, 6 of one kind and 4 of another. The first 6 have the same exact components (DC21140 with National MII transceiver) AFAICT but a slightly different PCB revision it seems, the slightly older ones are more affected than later revisions. The last 4 are strictly identical: DC21143 with Level One (now Intel AFAIR) transceivers, and all 4 behave identically. At least it does not seem to depend on the phase of the moon :-) I'm still using 2.2 with de4x5 driver, but there were very few differences with the 2.4 version of the driver last time I looked. Gabriel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/