Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266229AbUAGQLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:11:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266230AbUAGQLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:11:19 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:43014 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266229AbUAGQLS (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:11:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:11:10 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_QFMT_V2 description Message-ID: <20040107161110.A30210@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Adrian Bunk , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040107155940.GB11523@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040107155940.GB11523@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:59:40PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 14 On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:59:40PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > In 2,4, the CONFIG_QFMT_V2 short description talks about a > "VFS v0 quota format". Is this really correct, or is the patch below > that uses the "Quota format v2 support" text from 2.6 instead correct? I think you should ask Jan Kara instead what he prefers. This VFS v0 stuff is his invention. Personally I'm a little confused about the proper naming, too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/