Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Suraj Singh <suraj1998@gmail.com>
To:     davem@davemloft.net
Cc:     kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Suraj Singh <suraj998@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: net: ipv4: tcp_westwood: fixed warnings and checks
Date:   Thu,  8 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0530
Message-Id: <1541668092-8661-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1541425985-31869-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com--annotate>
References: <1541425985-31869-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com--annotate>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Suraj Singh <suraj998@gmail.com>

Regrding why I used "staging: " in the commmit message, I was following Greg Kroah-Hartman's video on YouTube on how to submit your first patch, and in his sample commit, he'd started his commit message with "staging: ", and so I thought it was convention to do so. I'll remove that immediately. I made this same mistake in another patch that I just sent for TCP Vegas, I'll make the change there as well.

I didn't consider the complexities of calling the same function twice. I was looking more towards satisying the scriptpatch.pl's requirements. 

-		tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
+		tp->snd_cwnd = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
+		tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);

I've made the same mistake here. I'll make these changes and resubmit. Is there anything else that's wrong?