Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262353AbUAGWmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:42:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262458AbUAGWmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:42:13 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:32012 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262353AbUAGWmJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:42:09 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance Date: 7 Jan 2004 22:30:05 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: References: X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1073514605 7671 192.168.12.62 (7 Jan 2004 22:30:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1764 Lines: 42 In article , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: | On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: | | > server with 2.6.0 kernel: | > | > fast:2.6.0-test11 2m21s (*) | > fast:2.4.20 16.5s | > SA1100:2.4 never finishes (*) | > PXA:2.4.21-rmk1-pxa1 as above | > PXA:2.6.0-rmk1-pxa as above | > | > server: 2.4.21 | > | > fast:2.6.0-test11 6s | > fast:2.4.20 5s | > SA1100:2.4.19-rmk7 3.22s | > PXA:2.4.21-rmk1-pxa1 7s | > PXA:2.6.0-rmk2-pxa 1) 50s (**) | > (***) 2) 27s (**) | | s/fast/PC2/ | | Further, I tried the old 3c59x card - same problems persist. Also tried | PC2 as the server - same. nfs-utils version 1.0.6 (Debian Sarge). I sent a | copy of the yesterday's email + new details to nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, | netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org. | | Strange, that nobody is seeing this problem, but it looks pretty bad here. | Unless I missed some necessary update somewhere? The only one that seemed | relevant - nfs-utils on the server(s) from Documentation/Changes I | checked. I'm sure you checked this, but does mii-tool show that you have negotiated the proper connection to the hub or switch? I found that my 3cXXX and eepro100 cards were negotiating half duplex with the switches and cable modems, causing the throughput to go forth and conjugate the verb "to suck" until I fixed it. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/