Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp581183imu; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:28:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dCZKOCejU54mOsgBtdCPwFvdKeqMVrafLZwxj3kDfyz5gMMQzubqbdm1o8b2PReIRB1HES X-Received: by 2002:a63:5816:: with SMTP id m22-v6mr4904509pgb.332.1541708885465; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:28:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541708885; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bzMRrWFCGtunScHP6v/mTMtoh+k6nW8MN3/lM89Nl9/75PD4udiJFBaEsArbVcpjfw TS6JZnFuzyxu4PRWqKH1NNglvbV+W4y+SB/cPBWULY0Gnx8BNEYfsILSNSTEU4US05sE BJqREzpSrQd+apE/fA+V5K6cY0AgP2QDGOmYKB8CpjZZFTHuqyZzJCBQg0A//AcQ2DFu P4OMPNn3V1v8ZbWJKrLb23s3MEWBpHF3CPXNpdxIc9jbwnd28OrrdG8IEDBYGYpUsVrt 2aFQKRGWx72B7uawb2A+5s72iVKxL0Ps4NxO4z9fvZakR0/FGGG39H/keEP48bOM/uB2 lCOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=eqJjbCHAEJYXh7VPI1RSRqJm9STl7Tg0cByG9m1smiw=; b=xMj0phoQDrN65tF6M6TpMlumX8bQs/GFu/DZVg5HlwQY0OnW4NnmL+Q48x8qzQm3T1 L76ScbbbcGSpL8UK79vJoIuYqCIr5TgoJeyC2qz03a2AusQxhu4jo753TGMvDVl9iB6V +OQAzUS20pGeecLRAtjkXFso6f8jq5DaIlGzgItGuLyNildtgbc+LLCRn/FdYs3Jc+Z0 jexG7oTVbc1wQ3UmwYA7ExQW3vFidAuxTaQwSRmEbT83eHfOWyhWscNUTURh7xDGZ3pb rUgZm2un+CrQLUW5othNvlPGE58ryh0wtHtkcwrT2RjPNb5YLx5fV/P4fafsswoD4QHW uPAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m9-v6si4413043pgg.464.2018.11.08.12.27.49; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727324AbeKIGEH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 01:04:07 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:38996 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725882AbeKIGEH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 01:04:07 -0500 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 9A5E28BF; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:26:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:26:59 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: NeilBrown Cc: Jeff Layton , Alexander Viro , Martin Wilck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Filz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] fs/locks: rename some lists and pointers. Message-ID: <20181108202659.GD6090@fieldses.org> References: <154138128401.31651.1381177427603557514.stgit@noble> <154138144767.31651.11225349164396042986.stgit@noble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <154138144767.31651.11225349164396042986.stgit@noble> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:30:47PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > struct file lock contains an 'fl_next' pointer which > is used to point to the lock that this request is blocked > waiting for. So rename it to fl_blocker. > > The fl_blocked list_head in an active lock is the head of a list of > blocked requests. In a request it is a node in that list. > These are two distinct uses, so replace with two list_heads > with different names. > fl_blocked is the head of a list of blocked requests > fl_block is a node on that list. Reading these, I have a lot of trouble keeping fl_blocked, fl_block, and fl_blocker straight. Is it just me? I guess they form a tree, so fl_children, fl_siblings, and fl_parent might be easier for me to keep straight. --b. > > The two different list_heads are never used at the same time, but that > will change in a future patch. > > Note that a tracepoint is changed to report fl_blocker instead > of fl_next. > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown > --- > fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- > fs/locks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > include/linux/fs.h | 7 +++++-- > include/trace/events/filelock.h | 16 ++++++++-------- > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c > index 74c33d5fafc8..d7ed895e05d1 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c > @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock) > rc = posix_lock_file(file, flock, NULL); > up_write(&cinode->lock_sem); > if (rc == FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) { > - rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_next); > + rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_blocker); > if (!rc) > goto try_again; > posix_unblock_lock(flock); > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c > index 2ecb4db8c840..a6c6d601286c 100644 > --- a/fs/locks.c > +++ b/fs/locks.c > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS); > * This lock protects the blocked_hash. Generally, if you're accessing it, you > * want to be holding this lock. > * > - * In addition, it also protects the fl->fl_block list, and the fl->fl_next > + * In addition, it also protects the fl->fl_blocked list, and the fl->fl_blocker > * pointer for file_lock structures that are acting as lock requests (in > * contrast to those that are acting as records of acquired locks). > * > @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static void locks_init_lock_heads(struct file_lock *fl) > { > INIT_HLIST_NODE(&fl->fl_link); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_list); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_blocked); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_block); > init_waitqueue_head(&fl->fl_wait); > } > @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl) > { > BUG_ON(waitqueue_active(&fl->fl_wait)); > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_list)); > + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_blocked)); > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_block)); > BUG_ON(!hlist_unhashed(&fl->fl_link)); > > @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) > { > locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter); > list_del_init(&waiter->fl_block); > - waiter->fl_next = NULL; > + waiter->fl_blocker = NULL; > } > > static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) > @@ -683,16 +685,16 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) > * it seems like the reasonable thing to do. > * > * Must be called with both the flc_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The > - * fl_block list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring > + * fl_blocked list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring > * that the flc_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the > - * blocked_lock_lock in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty. > + * blocked_lock_lock in some cases when we see that the fl_blocked list is empty. > */ > static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker, > struct file_lock *waiter) > { > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_block)); > - waiter->fl_next = blocker; > - list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block); > + waiter->fl_blocker = blocker; > + list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_blocked); > if (IS_POSIX(blocker) && !IS_OFDLCK(blocker)) > locks_insert_global_blocked(waiter); > } > @@ -716,18 +718,18 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker) > /* > * Avoid taking global lock if list is empty. This is safe since new > * blocked requests are only added to the list under the flc_lock, and > - * the flc_lock is always held here. Note that removal from the fl_block > + * the flc_lock is always held here. Note that removal from the fl_blocked > * list does not require the flc_lock, so we must recheck list_empty() > * after acquiring the blocked_lock_lock. > */ > - if (list_empty(&blocker->fl_block)) > + if (list_empty(&blocker->fl_blocked)) > return; > > spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock); > - while (!list_empty(&blocker->fl_block)) { > + while (!list_empty(&blocker->fl_blocked)) { > struct file_lock *waiter; > > - waiter = list_first_entry(&blocker->fl_block, > + waiter = list_first_entry(&blocker->fl_blocked, > struct file_lock, fl_block); > __locks_delete_block(waiter); > if (waiter->fl_lmops && waiter->fl_lmops->lm_notify) > @@ -878,7 +880,7 @@ static struct file_lock *what_owner_is_waiting_for(struct file_lock *block_fl) > > hash_for_each_possible(blocked_hash, fl, fl_link, posix_owner_key(block_fl)) { > if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl)) > - return fl->fl_next; > + return fl->fl_blocker; > } > return NULL; > } > @@ -1237,7 +1239,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode_wait(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) > error = posix_lock_inode(inode, fl, NULL); > if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) > break; > - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); > + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); > if (!error) > continue; > > @@ -1324,7 +1326,7 @@ int locks_mandatory_area(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, loff_t start, > error = posix_lock_inode(inode, &fl, NULL); > if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) > break; > - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl.fl_wait, !fl.fl_next); > + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl.fl_wait, !fl.fl_blocker); > if (!error) { > /* > * If we've been sleeping someone might have > @@ -1518,7 +1520,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type) > > locks_dispose_list(&dispose); > error = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(new_fl->fl_wait, > - !new_fl->fl_next, break_time); > + !new_fl->fl_blocker, break_time); > > percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(&file_rwsem); > spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock); > @@ -1931,7 +1933,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode_wait(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) > error = flock_lock_inode(inode, fl); > if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) > break; > - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); > + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); > if (!error) > continue; > > @@ -2210,7 +2212,7 @@ static int do_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, > error = vfs_lock_file(filp, cmd, fl, NULL); > if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) > break; > - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); > + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); > if (!error) > continue; > > @@ -2581,7 +2583,7 @@ posix_unblock_lock(struct file_lock *waiter) > int status = 0; > > spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock); > - if (waiter->fl_next) > + if (waiter->fl_blocker) > __locks_delete_block(waiter); > else > status = -ENOENT; > @@ -2707,7 +2709,7 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v) > > lock_get_status(f, fl, iter->li_pos, ""); > > - list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block) > + list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_blocked, fl_block) > lock_get_status(f, bfl, iter->li_pos, " ->"); > > return 0; > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > index c95c0807471f..a161bcdca8a2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > @@ -1044,10 +1044,13 @@ bool opens_in_grace(struct net *); > * Obviously, the last two criteria only matter for POSIX locks. > */ > struct file_lock { > - struct file_lock *fl_next; /* singly linked list for this inode */ > + struct file_lock *fl_blocker; /* The lock, that is blocking us */ > struct list_head fl_list; /* link into file_lock_context */ > struct hlist_node fl_link; /* node in global lists */ > - struct list_head fl_block; /* circular list of blocked processes */ > + struct list_head fl_blocked; /* list of requests with > + * ->fl_blocker pointing here */ > + struct list_head fl_block; /* node in > + * ->fl_blocker->fl_blocked */ > fl_owner_t fl_owner; > unsigned int fl_flags; > unsigned char fl_type; > diff --git a/include/trace/events/filelock.h b/include/trace/events/filelock.h > index 68b17c116907..fad7befa612d 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/filelock.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/filelock.h > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, > __field(struct file_lock *, fl) > __field(unsigned long, i_ino) > __field(dev_t, s_dev) > - __field(struct file_lock *, fl_next) > + __field(struct file_lock *, fl_blocker) > __field(fl_owner_t, fl_owner) > __field(unsigned int, fl_pid) > __field(unsigned int, fl_flags) > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, > __entry->fl = fl ? fl : NULL; > __entry->s_dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; > __entry->i_ino = inode->i_ino; > - __entry->fl_next = fl ? fl->fl_next : NULL; > + __entry->fl_blocker = fl ? fl->fl_blocker : NULL; > __entry->fl_owner = fl ? fl->fl_owner : NULL; > __entry->fl_pid = fl ? fl->fl_pid : 0; > __entry->fl_flags = fl ? fl->fl_flags : 0; > @@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, > __entry->ret = ret; > ), > > - TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_next=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_pid=%u fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_start=%lld fl_end=%lld ret=%d", > + TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_blocker=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_pid=%u fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_start=%lld fl_end=%lld ret=%d", > __entry->fl, MAJOR(__entry->s_dev), MINOR(__entry->s_dev), > - __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_next, __entry->fl_owner, > + __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_blocker, __entry->fl_owner, > __entry->fl_pid, show_fl_flags(__entry->fl_flags), > show_fl_type(__entry->fl_type), > __entry->fl_start, __entry->fl_end, __entry->ret) > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, > __field(struct file_lock *, fl) > __field(unsigned long, i_ino) > __field(dev_t, s_dev) > - __field(struct file_lock *, fl_next) > + __field(struct file_lock *, fl_blocker) > __field(fl_owner_t, fl_owner) > __field(unsigned int, fl_flags) > __field(unsigned char, fl_type) > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, > __entry->fl = fl ? fl : NULL; > __entry->s_dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; > __entry->i_ino = inode->i_ino; > - __entry->fl_next = fl ? fl->fl_next : NULL; > + __entry->fl_blocker = fl ? fl->fl_blocker : NULL; > __entry->fl_owner = fl ? fl->fl_owner : NULL; > __entry->fl_flags = fl ? fl->fl_flags : 0; > __entry->fl_type = fl ? fl->fl_type : 0; > @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, > __entry->fl_downgrade_time = fl ? fl->fl_downgrade_time : 0; > ), > > - TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_next=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_break_time=%lu fl_downgrade_time=%lu", > + TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_blocker=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_break_time=%lu fl_downgrade_time=%lu", > __entry->fl, MAJOR(__entry->s_dev), MINOR(__entry->s_dev), > - __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_next, __entry->fl_owner, > + __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_blocker, __entry->fl_owner, > show_fl_flags(__entry->fl_flags), > show_fl_type(__entry->fl_type), > __entry->fl_break_time, __entry->fl_downgrade_time) >