Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 111/171] futex: futex_wake_op, do not fail on invalid op
Date:   Thu,  8 Nov 2018 13:51:21 -0800
Message-Id: <20181108215135.344756191@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181108215127.257643509@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181108215127.257643509@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit e78c38f6bdd900b2ad9ac9df8eff58b745dc5b3c ]

In commit 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined
behaviour"), I let FUTEX_WAKE_OP to fail on invalid op.  Namely when op
should be considered as shift and the shift is out of range (< 0 or > 31).

But strace's test suite does this madness:

  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xa0caffee);
  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xbadfaced);
  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xffffffff);

When I pick the first 0xa0caffee, it decodes as:

  0x80000000 & 0xa0caffee: oparg is shift
  0x70000000 & 0xa0caffee: op is FUTEX_OP_OR
  0x0f000000 & 0xa0caffee: cmp is FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ
  0x00fff000 & 0xa0caffee: oparg is sign-extended 0xcaf = -849
  0x00000fff & 0xa0caffee: cmparg is sign-extended 0xfee = -18

That means the op tries to do this:

  (futex |= (1 << (-849))) == -18

which is completely bogus. The new check of op in the code is:

        if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
                if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
                        return -EINVAL;
                oparg = 1 << oparg;
        }

which results obviously in the "Invalid argument" errno:

  FAIL: futex
  ===========

  futex(0x7fabd78bcffc, 0x5, 0xfacefeed, 0xb, 0x7fabd78bcffc, 0xa0caffee) = -1: Invalid argument
  futex.test: failed test: ../futex failed with code 1

So let us soften the failure to print only a (ratelimited) message, crop
the value and continue as if it were right.  When userspace keeps up, we
can switch this to return -EINVAL again.

[v2] Do not return 0 immediatelly, proceed with the cropped value.

Fixes: 30d6e0a4190d ("futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/futex.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index c3ea6f2a6997..053d7be08be5 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1467,8 +1467,16 @@ static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(unsigned int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
 	int oldval, ret;
 
 	if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) {
-		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (oparg < 0 || oparg > 31) {
+			char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
+			/*
+			 * kill this print and return -EINVAL when userspace
+			 * is sane again
+			 */
+			pr_info_ratelimited("futex_wake_op: %s tries to shift op by %d; fix this program\n",
+					get_task_comm(comm, current), oparg);
+			oparg &= 31;
+		}
 		oparg = 1 << oparg;
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.1