Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp566536imu; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dt1atWopeChCv2NIzN5YM931dl4rStRDPpHbB2JRxQqmfTLvqRlE/cVGUTBCgJSlSYB5l5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:148:: with SMTP id 66-v6mr5180973plb.66.1541758912673; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541758912; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rroymQ4UA/AiYOrTsS1iLr0ljFy7g6IJECmiB0WGvkM3yrhq4CDjm0HLyLhZ2DyZYr pfFzxc5J0klprvSNEnb4/AFhxVzbxLtTetmWTCDbqLN8Eq4/1NSi5H4jsP5rSZf1Mi3n 705hlGrks/517nwn4nssygld+DVA3ZzfUXrRR8EE/3dY1ORN+SpMrhYX76N3iTDnuhz3 irMUhmAgfN3kHl+oppv4RjiZbUQtQnDzfL7WrpMs9jPg+XgiimMKLBuo1Q4Bny4q1+ct wVye/5FtxH//eemNwP3fT5z1JJnukr9ZpuVHfDD7XljDpcUDYBfa8yz3p5Pbji8xUCmV Nbag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=9Kl5vrh1kDg76/kGVndw3vlbg1Q+QRJpIjMSyiauW6U=; b=iWXYukGnSWHvt1VuX4LZEhkTg35I2raQq6d1QRnvqNZZpjpJ14gW1dl7sDYTIr/eHT RdBjXxX5PZnDPWF69dUTfhsO3F8R2FIUYtq6D/vXZUeLiDDH64DaNUZhZjvuDJ89MLSy iZSXmB+2Ys7gGz9ZAvPb46TQLVTRt9AQlyj8AzMAEdTSUJdeox9dHypd4px/XrPDLOwe XxP7Q+2BU3UnIS0n+EXUwRPk6zzsOd0e12wC4nSbSwZMrwOLBgbVlJvI+cUopfyrzNUm 8jMeNcj2JPFz3VCajWib3A3iGepLGapiPPb5jI4aOoX22tk5WfMgKpCBVpz7k9n2e6lf hzqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a4-v6si7880628pln.67.2018.11.09.02.21.37; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728116AbeKIUAm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:00:42 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56628 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727878AbeKIUAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:00:41 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9901CA78; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.162.0.72] (p8cg001049571a15.blr.arm.com [10.162.0.72]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5482F3F718; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:20:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 02/11] mm: soft-offline: add missing error check of set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() To: Naoya Horiguchi , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Mike Kravetz , xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com, Laurent Dufour References: <1541746035-13408-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1541746035-13408-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <9ea93154-4843-231d-d72b-bf12c8807c24@arm.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:50:41 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1541746035-13408-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/09/2018 12:17 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() could fail, then the target page is > finally not isolated, so it's better to report -EBUSY for userspace > to know the failure and chance of retry. > IIUC set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() could only fail if the page is not free in the buddy. At least for soft_offline_huge_page() that wont be the case otherwise dissolve_free_huge_page() would have returned non zero -EBUSY. Is there any other reason set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() would not succeed ? > And for consistency, this patch moves set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() > in unmap_and_move() to __soft_offline_page(). Yeah this check should be handled in soft offline functions not inside migrations they trigger.