Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp757217imu; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 05:41:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ffXOYTYzrD7/QZPc6e7TGfaOT78Z0puUEHK6jvU40YO+4YfECYcrTNyLzWWXrfpCxz3IW9 X-Received: by 2002:a63:db48:: with SMTP id x8mr7269926pgi.365.1541770916143; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 05:41:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541770916; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KKlxRKpiJKlx6Td9BGd5er1mQ+gdNhRkSzTGpNE9SThMCHAtyO12B7pCeRGxFhl8yr Ue/m+9QLtjRa1c8bbN2MhomUrKWT/4u02tWVNfQAoGPi3d2Ee5p5rmt4bAk06KMS8CtI cfupLBHZzrhV+8J8nd8ZMQv7cnL1kWI9S9/+pxEQ9Hj+x1lyoiOwUK+7aLHPyJUPDUxu MJOSibzOTCsEXbbZ8Ge27fE995+MjdP1z5k/uR/CI0HNdfoPiNNgHu+btXvXPKcXzQvS RNAthheCPMxftc2xzRkcuj1XZBuc0xaY9wMWUiKgf9b2zkgaLcb0ByeZrMbdLqTB+k9a C7tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=h56GYIkQArlK2Thl4aC4opL/+F/frmtxRwVFo8rCcfk=; b=qi6RlPE+Q9Ez4qKmlyB3ZegtVjz5kvREb3lQHa+mFPGq3jxxXEO9gKotNjWxiFy1Yg fbufEULpD6X5xtZ/dvTWYcDutXxQ9CwzG3py60QsaZwaiM9Hd/zj/PljPGgtbDyJUCcP 9Qemyy/yFhyUOPiCBrYPE9x08kBUYvq+CVR4At/0+ytevm1U22koc/p4P5MK8t298Y7S u12biF4z4ec4XQWlgg3W4t+QVTaXrcOmgYGlstjDMgIpCfO/MfHq6pquemgRdnxUIGhw vket+Vp4zd8Xtj7dmSZtfxQ61Vfbo4i77Smf96I+0ViH7YwVRhUvRFAiUBDriXMmhVT7 oaHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i33-v6si7368859pld.433.2018.11.09.05.41.30; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 05:41:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727955AbeKIXVb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 18:21:31 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55352 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727784AbeKIXVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 18:21:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wA9DdbJ0043058 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:40:49 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2nn991wu5c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:40:49 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:40:47 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:40:44 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id wA9DehFU60358796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:40:43 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0255204F; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:40:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mschwideX1 (unknown [9.152.212.164]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C4152050; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:40:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:40:42 +0100 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 4.20 #2 In-Reply-To: References: <20181109081402.777716d1@mschwideX1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18110913-4275-0000-0000-000002DE5AD1 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18110913-4276-0000-0000-000037EB5E0E Message-Id: <20181109144042.4546b7ce@mschwideX1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-11-09_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1811090127 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 06:39:07 -0600 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:14 AM Martin Schwidefsky > wrote: > > > > s390 updates for 4.20-rc2 > > Pulled. > > > - A fix for the pgtable_bytes misaccounting on s390. The patch changes > > common code part in regard to page table folding and adds extra > > checks to mm_[inc|dec]_nr_[pmds|puds]. > > Ugh. This is somewhat invasive, I worry that some header include or > architecture doesn't pick up on the subtle __PAGETABLE_XYZ_FOLDED > things (if you don't get the includes, the mm_xyz_folded() maros will > be mis-defined. > > Has this been in linux-next or any other wide testing? The changes > aren't _new_, but... Just checked linux-next, the first version that picked up the patches is 2018-11-19. The one dated 2018-10-19 does not have them. Bad timing, no wider testing has been done. The bug itself shows up as a false warning, nothing really breaks. I would understand if you prefer not to have them in the official tree at this time. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.