Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:56:29 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] x86/fpu: Use ULL for shift in
 xfeature_uncompacted_offset()
Message-ID: <20181109165629.c5vp3io6jipwwvd5@linutronix.de>
References: <20181107194858.9380-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20181107194858.9380-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20181108113817.GB7543@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181108113817.GB7543@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2018-11-08 12:38:17 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Or simply BIT_ULL(xfeature_nr).

Yes, why not. Updated. Thanks.

Sebastian