Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Suraj Singh <suraj1998@gmail.com>
To:     davem@davemloft.net
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        suraj1998@gmail.com
Subject: Re: net: ipv4: tcp_vegas
Date:   Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:38:54 +0530
Message-Id: <1541956134-14029-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181108.103428.494936194513918478.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20181108.103428.494936194513918478.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

I don't think you've been getting my emails because I've been sending them
in response to the message-id of my patch. 
Here's my last one:

I'm sorry if I have seemed unresponsive to you but it took me a 
while to figure out how to respond to threads using the corresponding mail
-id. I think the first two comments that you wrote on my initial patch with 
message-id: 1541425985-31869-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com were being
redirected to my spam folder and since I didn't have mutt configured
then, I didn't see them, 

The reason I've been prefixing all the subject of my mails with "staging: "
is because I was following Greg Kroah-Hartman's YouTube video on how to 
submit your first kernel patch. I didn't realise the significance
of usingit and didn't take the time out to understand what it really meant and that
is my bad. I've got clarifications for the same in comments to the patch with 
message-id: trinity-0d747914-3749-46c4-a5e8-fb7141a9b7c2-1541672570683@3c-app-gmx-bs57

Other than unwarranted "staging: " in the subject, are there any other changes
that need to be made before I submit [v3] of the second tcp_westwood patch
(1541670377-17483-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com)? 


On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:34:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Suraj Singh <suraj1998@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu,  8 Nov 2018 13:59:52 +0530
>
> > Fixed checks and warnings in TCP Vegas
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Singh <suraj1998@gmail.com>
>
> Once again, please explain why you are putting "staging: " into the subject
> line of your TCP congestion control patches.
>
> If you do not answer this question and fix your Subject lines, I will
> really have no choice but to ignore your submissions as you are
> ignoring our feedback.
>
> Thank you.