Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 34/41] percpu-rwsem: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu()
Date:   Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:44:03 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20181111194104.GA4787@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20181111194104.GA4787@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20181111194410.6368-34-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code
as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be
replaced by synchronize_rcu().  This commit therefore makes this change,
even though it is but a comment.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
---
 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
index 79b99d653e03..71b75643c432 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *
 	 * cannot both change sem->state from readers_fast and start checking
 	 * counters while we are here. So if we see !sem->state, we know that
 	 * the writer won't be checking until we're past the preempt_enable()
-	 * and that one the synchronize_sched() is done, the writer will see
+	 * and that once the synchronize_rcu() is done, the writer will see
 	 * anything we did within this RCU-sched read-size critical section.
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
-- 
2.17.1