Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3332317imu; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:33:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cT0qOptl9ipz/L+hRPDklv9RFUyiJTkVzUxJmfphObsU8Ve6I7IJQvbwmmD+5gFneoSAx9 X-Received: by 2002:a63:396:: with SMTP id 144mr15237285pgd.68.1541968428041; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:33:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541968428; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BCFgr18TIf2dpEaiGKh+A9326Hn/wSxYhhRACFnVAv9FWYytVbwHv+iL++4/EpI8yo qqT7sSIiXkd8GSg0h6hN+ATLRb7i5ijhZthH+TuSkgctjA4CNmXQZlVU7H3lW7QzoRdy bVu8RCWhLZ2HVauD5H8a9QCd1lzWP/Cx9Q3mQ0ZiXF+itySqkNAzhJWWB1rK6L40IgyH LGQX3qGLMw8njnGcjb+/SVSRXFwVWnxp4JW9I6bX0n1fTQEO2jvZXTifQwoGKsfKpTCt 4+nhk21um+gxruOyxYY7cQ9RDq2uDRKmP9hTarVFcTm2/ppf8chfuOSKsfslx0fCo0mU KwSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=EYB52KLObO3XPxzjKebR/tYSckifeIx9QSPahOtpeg0=; b=MFLtxNUjoifxI/1clg28pnueet2iwHd/Ioy4Tz+g9tDSTiMo+AwHHHXUOBTeGLjWUM mIibLltdEPsfR5Rk8B2eD36hIAadFnlEhoODbNCChLYEMgRF8YYeqmHPGS23ySCgDH4w kxVtb3x9piNVMbXGNxPSrRnRxETWd5/kn5ihDFD2ytlZ2TgK+NTXrT0DTEbKHrvp3uGJ LXRzPOUz27sBVt1fwGgHCmpm+nRvXxap3tuSULpeVmlCySBIK2brWFqTl9veHCPX0ZNp rfTNvIFGX+Y9ATqzFVfyw8ZBeZMxlMVtRjJ8zfqYsZ1sqHb4flvXmVPgf7qh6NusvSnM cd6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10-v6si13980895pgv.487.2018.11.11.12.33.33; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731148AbeKLGWo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:22:44 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50148 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730273AbeKLFsQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:48:16 -0500 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gLvsc-0000oM-1K; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 19:58:46 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gLvsZ-0001pl-C8; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 19:58:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Al Viro" Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 19:49:05 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 319/366] unify dentry_iput() and dentry_unlink_inode() In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.61-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Al Viro commit 550dce01dd606c88a837138aa448ccd367fb0cbb upstream. There is a lot of duplication between dentry_unlink_inode() and dentry_iput(). The only real difference is that dentry_unlink_inode() bumps ->d_seq and dentry_iput() doesn't. The argument of the latter is known to have been unhashed, so anybody who might've found it in RCU lookup would already be doomed to a ->d_seq mismatch. And we want to avoid pointless smp_rmb() there. This patch makes dentry_unlink_inode() bump ->d_seq only for hashed dentries. It's safe (d_delete() calls that sucker only if we are holding the only reference to dentry, so rehash is not going to happen) and it allows to use dentry_unlink_inode() in __dentry_kill() and get rid of dentry_iput(). The interesting question here is profiling; it *is* a hot path, and extra conditional jumps in there might or might not be painful. Signed-off-by: Al Viro [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/dcache.c | 45 ++++++++++----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -333,44 +333,21 @@ static inline void dentry_rcuwalk_barrie /* * Release the dentry's inode, using the filesystem - * d_iput() operation if defined. Dentry has no refcount - * and is unhashed. - */ -static void dentry_iput(struct dentry * dentry) - __releases(dentry->d_lock) - __releases(dentry->d_inode->i_lock) -{ - struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; - if (inode) { - __d_clear_type_and_inode(dentry); - hlist_del_init(&dentry->d_u.d_alias); - spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); - if (!inode->i_nlink) - fsnotify_inoderemove(inode); - if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_iput) - dentry->d_op->d_iput(dentry, inode); - else - iput(inode); - } else { - spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); - } -} - -/* - * Release the dentry's inode, using the filesystem - * d_iput() operation if defined. dentry remains in-use. + * d_iput() operation if defined. */ static void dentry_unlink_inode(struct dentry * dentry) __releases(dentry->d_lock) __releases(dentry->d_inode->i_lock) { struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; + bool hashed = !d_unhashed(dentry); - raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq); + if (hashed) + raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq); __d_clear_type_and_inode(dentry); hlist_del_init(&dentry->d_u.d_alias); - raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq); + if (hashed) + raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq); spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); if (!inode->i_nlink) @@ -537,12 +514,10 @@ static void __dentry_kill(struct dentry dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED; if (parent) spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock); - dentry_iput(dentry); - /* - * dentry_iput drops the locks, at which point nobody (except - * transient RCU lookups) can reach this dentry. - */ - BUG_ON((int)dentry->d_lockref.count > 0); + if (dentry->d_inode) + dentry_unlink_inode(dentry); + else + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry); if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_release) dentry->d_op->d_release(dentry);