Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:11:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:11:23 -0500 Received: from [64.64.109.142] ([64.64.109.142]:29705 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:11:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3AC09F14.53D06AC7@didntduck.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:09:24 -0500 From: Brian Gerst X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ebuddington@wesleyan.edu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 386 'ls' gets SIGILL iff /proc is mounted In-Reply-To: <20010327012709.I59@sparrow.nad.adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Buddington wrote: > > 2.4.2-ac23 nfsroot on a 386SX/20 with 6Mb RAM > > On boot to single user, 'ls' and 'ls -l' work fine. > > After mounting /proc, 'ls' still works, but 'ls -l' fails > with SIGILL after reading /etc/timezone (so says strace). > > Unmounting /proc fixes the problem. Unmounting /dev doesn't. > > I also, just now, had a spate of 'permission denied' errors > while trying to ls /dev/ subdirectories, and unexpected stale NFS handles. > > The problems are varied enough that I suspect bad hardware, but would > flaky RAM cause such similar failures repeatedly? And is there a way > to test RAM explicitly? > > Any tips appreciated, either to me (ebuddington@wesleyan.edu) or to > the list. Silly question, but is math emulation enabled? -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/