Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265506AbUAIEnk (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:43:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265516AbUAIEnj (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:43:39 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:53745 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265506AbUAIEni (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:43:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3FFE31B6.1030205@osdl.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:44:38 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nigel Cunningham CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Is this too ugly to merge? References: <1073609923.2003.10.camel@laptop-linux> In-Reply-To: <1073609923.2003.10.camel@laptop-linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 19 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm wanting to the opinion, if I may, of more experienced people > regarding changes I have implemented in my version of Software Suspend, > which I want to merge with Patrick and Pavel. Since I'm don't expect > that you're all familiar with how my version works, I'll give a fair bit > of background before I come to the question. Do they all have to be big ugly macros? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/