Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Request stat64 on RV32
In-Reply-To: <CAEn-LTpXnzSG-rVVvv_2cbxqY2vTchOKn6M0isRBovoq4jpZGw@mail.gmail.com>
CC:     zongbox@gmail.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        zong@andestech.com, marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:     david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com
Message-ID: <mhng-63079855-2270-4a5b-bde6-82a13f29230a@palmer-si-x1c4>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:19:02 PST (-0800), david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:10 AM Zong Li <zongbox@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The stat64 family that is used on 32-bit architectures to replace
>> newstat.
>>
>> Since commit 67314ec7b0250290cc85eaa7a2f88a8ddb9e8547 ("RISC-V: Request
>> newstat syscalls"), the RV32 build fail with undeclared 'sys_fstatat64'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong@andestech.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
>> index eff7aa9..a4aade9 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
>> @@ -18,5 +18,6 @@
>>
>>  #define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
>>  #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE
>> +#define __ARCH_WANT_STAT64
>>  #include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
>>  #include <uapi/asm/syscalls.h>
>> --
>
> See: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2018-November/002087.html
>
> The plan is not to have old stat syscalls and support statx on
> riscv32, which is y2038 safe.
>
> The issue you see is a bug in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h.
> Marcin (CC) already sent a patch to Arnd (CC) IIRC. Basically without
> __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT or __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 two macros are not defined:
> __NR3264_fstatat and __NR3264_fstat. Which is later used (without any
> guards):
>
> 763 #define __NR_newfstatat __NR3264_fstatat
> 764 #define __NR_fstat __NR3264_fstat

I agree.  Thanks!