Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261539AbUAIN1f (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:27:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261552AbUAIN1f (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:27:35 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:58765 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261539AbUAIN1d (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:27:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:27:31 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_QFMT_V2 description Message-ID: <20040109132731.GC28922@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20040107155940.GB11523@fs.tum.de> <20040107161110.A30210@infradead.org> <20040109022742.GA1440@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109022742.GA1440@fs.tum.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1451 Lines: 27 > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:11:10PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:59:40PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > In 2,4, the CONFIG_QFMT_V2 short description talks about a > > > "VFS v0 quota format". Is this really correct, or is the patch below > > > that uses the "Quota format v2 support" text from 2.6 instead correct? > > > > I think you should ask Jan Kara instead what he prefers. This VFS v0 > > stuff is his invention. Personally I'm a little confused about the proper > > naming, too. > > Jan, could you check whether the patch below is correct? I don't have a strong opinion on this but I like the current state slightly more. I know there's a mess that VFSv0 = quota_v2. But currently it's at least in the state that what users (admins) see is VFSv0 and v2 appears only in the name of kernel config options and in the identifiers in the code. Changing VFSv0 to "v2" in kernel is no problem but quota-tools use VFSv0 too and it's also used as an identifier of a quota format in the options of quota tools (hence renaming is higly unpleasant for admins). So I'm not sure that renaming config options in kernel doesn't make things even more messy. Honza - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/