Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180925145622.29959-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20180925145622.29959-24-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <7830522a-968e-0880-beb7-44904466cf14@labo.rs> <CAHmME9oQJ9y51Pv7U=+=5uDA_tb+U1zWZdsLcyNMhdcFZmjM8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <e4b500e9-f24a-43c5-c2df-834dafc3aae5@labo.rs> <CAHmME9q8tp3Ch43o3D6zYTVujcjBWLVpNdzVw6RqYqHisd_suQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw7e61mbbLMoDwshxpWWK+oGUz71pGrsUYVX8uWM-s5Krg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7e61mbbLMoDwshxpWWK+oGUz71pGrsUYVX8uWM-s5Krg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:13:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rOhBwsGhFXP8qmfX-0XooJ+CLekLZ7+mNpy3kw9oq0jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
To:     Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc:     labokml@labo.rs, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> you have a speling error (ECM). :)

Thanks.

>
> side note:
>
> I have to say that wireguard works really well with ecn and non-ecn marked flows
> against codel and fq_codel on the bottleneck router.

Yup!

> I'd still rather like it if wireguard focused a bit more on
> interleaving multiple flows better
> rather than on single stream benchmarks, one day.

We're working on it, actually. Toke has been running some tests on
some beefy 100gbps hardware he recently acquired, and after v1 lands
we'll probably have a few interesting ideas for this.

Jason