Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:56:27 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com,
        oleksandr@natalenko.name, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] kernfs: add function to find kernfs_node without
 increasing ref counter
Message-ID: <20181113015627.GI21824@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20181112095632.69114-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
 <20181112095632.69114-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
 <20181112122840.GA1429@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181112122840.GA1429@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:28:40AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:56:21AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > From: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>
> > 
> > The kernfs pseudo file system doesn't export any function to only find
> > a node by name, without also getting a reference on it.
> > But in some cases it is useful to just locate a kernfs node, while
> > using it or not depends on some other condition.
> > 
> > This commit adds a function to just look for a node, without getting
> > a reference on it.
> 
> Eeek, that sounds really bad.  So you save off a pointer to something,
> and have no idea if that pointer now really is valid or not?  It can
> instantly disappear right afterwards.
> 
> This feels wrong, what is the problem of having a properly reference
> counted object passed back to you that you have to create a dangerous
> function like this?

I agree with Greg, this function is dangerous.  What's wrong with using
find_get and then doing a put once you successfully take it over, or
fail to take it over?