Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp4964013imu; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:53:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fjpvyqVy4HpDJYbuHAS6wMXyLB89NPRmp5QBMIRF42quMOQUfHwU2RmR9xxdzOa+uOO6n3 X-Received: by 2002:a63:6302:: with SMTP id x2mr3513381pgb.183.1542088419552; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:53:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542088419; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eGB0Qy8kFtBtezPbu7OSvnoYOMh9CxalmL6qGOxci8A9qbGPxSGym0917AJ3AoFE9O hz4GtG2YF6JcoP4YS3euBwaFPM0UPHY8LUHoNlM728otnW0f2CBBpSwjQrdDmm42pVtK Ahn7GjGAKqEOmbV55QeUrR8HvuSEJCx+iiP4hZoernGV75ZW5WiifSj7VIlShkOjQvIR etpiuU1QvuUG9g1SxLavCAGPT54Fhybu2og5bm807RWfpUtPEq6TjxBBLj5hQ4Z5LWxD dr2JTf2sJ4F9TJachqoWvouWaGPxS7NQ1w6sIPW4mVLx30GAZXCh6YMMGmSrve6MAqLz 2O6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=Tb+PFJR2IKCdpDbK3xWSXfM5qKv31Mibk+I4CWY1b/8=; b=WmlPC3ZZ5Z2mNDHKy06QeigiVkqMzmEFboCjOte+sBW4VMGwSy1IldiUjYR4yk9pGR MDNFRFh3VqvzKZ8Pli/Gx5yakZWliPkCjFOARVg2zMBVNBdPJLpEddh+ice5a3JNpdHl V4z8gpnNxt6IpoTh4Vxa0sLcZsPKhmgoG4cxb59qM0gPNjRARtGx8FW6gUztRX7hQ2vG hsWCvZj38ZEjKsl4nFctBYfPu2ObY+AQFxZUEYoS7jo9Parmhen6nLseEZ43sNxzlx07 /nU4i/bW7RyxE6+osknf6gB2DxeVLVju/k8ETlUoINKcX67AZlOzrYZHbfbMUF3+Qhqq X+OA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=f9vzizpO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bh4-v6si5625105plb.196.2018.11.12.21.53.24; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=f9vzizpO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732848AbeKMPsv (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:48:51 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35644 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731660AbeKMPsv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:48:51 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (unknown [64.114.255.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD09222520; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:52:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1542088343; bh=raKXOlBYyY1dhZ8zfDWcewKkrc8fEfv94VEKNDSzoeU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f9vzizpOuDi8+H9TYgapK1mj9pRWAIBdx/VllMl2MP1k9VAY1hgvwLAUiTlxetq+i tZbPp+NJgXrpsED1TDt62qGf2xSflL2VztTJFSYaCPYZC5lr328yKvmRzP1dRJjO+D 6qbbvOal4KJQm3TV1fksabzzZqMWG86bBuf/pd/8= From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Colin Ian King , Steve French , Sasha Levin , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 02/17] cifs: don't dereference smb_file_target before null check Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:52:08 -0500 Message-Id: <20181113055223.79060-2-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181113055223.79060-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20181113055223.79060-1-sashal@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Colin Ian King [ Upstream commit 8c6c9bed8773375b1d54ccca2911ec892c59db5d ] There is a null check on dst_file->private data which suggests it can be potentially null. However, before this check, pointer smb_file_target is derived from dst_file->private and dereferenced in the call to tlink_tcon, hence there is a potential null pointer deference. Fix this by assigning smb_file_target and target_tcon after the null pointer sanity checks. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1475302 ("Dereference before null check") Fixes: 04b38d601239 ("vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c index 87658f63b374..be84d49f2406 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c @@ -927,8 +927,8 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off, struct inode *src_inode = file_inode(src_file); struct inode *target_inode = file_inode(dst_file); struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_src = src_file->private_data; - struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data; - struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink); + struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target; + struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon; unsigned int xid; int rc; @@ -942,6 +942,9 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off, goto out; } + smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data; + target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink); + /* * Note: cifs case is easier than btrfs since server responsible for * checks for proper open modes and file type and if it wants -- 2.17.1