Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:57:08 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     wang.yi59@zte.com.cn
Cc:     tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warning for init_IRQ()
Message-ID: <20181113115708.GE10502@zn.tnic>
References: <20181113101701.GB10502@zn.tnic>
 <201811131931442413258@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201811131931442413258@zte.com.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:31:44PM +0800, wang.yi59@zte.com.cn wrote:
> I thought this can keep patches dependent and can be reverted easily if one
> of them has something wrong.

Same thing with per-directory or subsystem - just less granulary.

> Thanks for your suggestion, I will do as you advised. :-)

Yeah, this was just an idea. Let's see how it really works out.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.