Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262714AbUAISIu (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:08:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262792AbUAISIu (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:08:50 -0500 Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.56]:693 "EHLO mtaw6.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262714AbUAISIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:08:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:08:39 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Jakub Jelinek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Message-ID: <20040109180839.GW1882@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Juhl , Jakub Jelinek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040109102851.GF24876@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 806 Lines: 15 On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > I just wanted to get some feedback initially. The patch was a very minor > bit of the email I send, and probably the least important bit. > I wanted to get peoples reactions to the thought of adding stronger sanity > checks. The patch was just a minor thing - the discussion about "do we > want additional checks?" was the important bit. There are some patches for the elf loader from one of the big names in LKML, but I forgot who it was. Maybe a search through google will bring something up... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/