Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp5323666imu; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ctdGdRyBkXcxFmhzwVkR/pK2xamFIiSFZLlPuV9dK5TpqNZjX2h9GVGPmGsPDlSbgFauhp X-Received: by 2002:a63:6984:: with SMTP id e126mr4720827pgc.143.1542113844438; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542113844; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Regyi3nGaoZYABNKUBO4Jv5Tof/NM1naZvEc9G8bTN7RboqaE5ldVwCRxJHJL3lizr UWsVBw110sheV7yTd4FykEShFH4GKcwVYQaaWe1crQU+OxZtGVKAiAqHumFEzTnnHOCd SxC4yIQ/glam0OhZ4xU3Go6ahZY89K1QhDxqJtJ+Xv68AM24G7P38JKoiRAxHmKRHTdR vLqLzAoAaEysasgSex5V2T/4XbOd+Kpc3bhmjsLzbR2/f7E4t48S78kaxi5Hjn31NYE5 l6N0/w65iIeiXJsB3lkPzQ2o2y9bv4dR+9KEjU5b7WZlRJlC5agWdWTs9VcFo8dk+9QI TAqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=yB4x6eCC/Z4PnNesI9kgEIIRDn4sLGBntRD1B3tz+xQ=; b=wOozUVRm5aePH6xbFHWB0cmUYSR+RUTLZKITYWFzQ9UE/YlV0+VBggZAm6CEI1Qu4k guca0i0w5Z+dadSR0CC8fJW5cu3qPF/2p7GNZ7kz1INN8Aung1vnkNIHHk8BcxWudYGR 0+0TEWV+g46tNcxciAkFGOoxx47D7JFX6Y0UYBIq3dTN7KyizM71kyfvDKOqwdcrqJxv 5qQD27JM6jQvCOeKAEO7/ARm9OV1DC3wJfknsDdy5g1nrWNIhcPzvkdbskNMcMyPYeOP nPnzlo3TALvudmpTPsg/SYNzlDRSL/H0/mLhCKtRXP3n+kPqoaX6KPBBeZawjfliIzDp N17w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p4si3230347pga.514.2018.11.13.04.57.09; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733167AbeKMWyW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:22 -0500 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:32752 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732728AbeKMWyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:22 -0500 Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1C2A12AD87957; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:56:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FRAEMA705-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.206.14.54) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:56:18 +0000 Received: from FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.76]) by FRAEMA705-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.199]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:56:12 +0100 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" CC: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Lukas Wunner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linuxarm Subject: RE: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue Thread-Topic: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue Thread-Index: AdR7RP5EYT33x2cVTRiE4AudJSgcHP///SQA///uY1D//9WZsA== Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:56:11 +0000 Message-ID: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA8387DF48F@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA8387DD344@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20181113122522.GA2500@lahna.fi.intel.com> <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA8387DF43F@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA8387DF43F@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.202.227.237] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Linuxarm [mailto:linuxarm-bounces@huawei.com] On Behalf Of > Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Sent: 13 November 2018 12:36 > To: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Lukas Wunner ; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm > Subject: RE: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com > > [mailto:mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: 13 November 2018 12:25 > > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Wangzhou (B) > > ; Linuxarm ; Lukas > > Wunner > > Subject: Re: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue > > > > +Lukas > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:45:42AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > wrote: > > > Hi Mika, > > > > Hi, > > > > > Since the commit commit 720d6a671a6e("PCI: pciehp: Do not handle events > > > if interrupts are masked"), the hotplug support on Qemu Guest(4.120-rc1) > > > with a vfio passthrough device seems to be broken. This is on an ARM64 > > platform. > > > > > > I am booting a Guest with below command line options with the intention of > > > hot add a ixgbevf dev later, > > > > > > ./qemu-system-aarch64 -machine virt,kernel_irqchip=on,gic-version=3 -cpu > > host \ > > > -kernel Image_4.20-rc1 \ > > > -initrd rootfs-iperf.cpio \ > > > -device ioh3420,id=rp1 \ > > > -net none \ > > > -m 4096 \ > > > -nographic -D -d -enable-kvm \ > > > -append "console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda -m 4096 rw > > pciehp.pciehp_debug=1 > > > pcie_ports=native searlycon=pl011,0x9000000" > > > > > > But receives this on boot, > > > > > > [ 1.327852] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout > > > on hotplug command 0x03f1 (issued 1016 msec ago) > > > [ 1.335842] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x03f1 (issued 1024 msec ago) > > > [ 3.847843] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Failed to check link status > > > [ 3.855843] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x02f1 (issued 2520 msec ago) > > > [ 4.879846] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x06f1 (issued 1024 msec ago) > > > [ 5.911840] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x06f1 (issued 2056 msec ago) > > > [ 6.927844] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x07f1 (issued 1016 msec ago) > > > [ 7.951843] pciehp 0000:00:01.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command > > > 0x0771 (issued 1024 msec ago) > > > > > > Trying to hot add using "device_addvfio- > > pci,host=0000:01:10.1,id=net0,bus=rp1" > > > doesn't work either. And if I boot the guest with an assigned device > > > (-device vfio-pci,host=0000:01:10.1,id=net0,bus=rp1), I can see the dev > listed > > in > > > the Guest but then hot remove doesn't work. > > > > > > This all works on 4.19 and bisect points to the above mentioned commit, > > where an > > > additional check is added in pciehp_isr(), > > > > > > - * Interrupts only occur in D3hot or shallower (PCIe r4.0, sec 6.7.3.4). > > > + * Interrupts only occur in D3hot or shallower and only if enabled > > > + * in the Slot Control register (PCIe r4.0, sec 6.7.3.4). > > > */ > > > - if (pdev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) > > > + if (pdev->current_state == PCI_D3cold || > > > + (!(ctrl->slot_ctrl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE) && !pciehp_poll_mode)) > > > return IRQ_NONE; > > > > > > I think this doesn't work for the first time, where the cmd with > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE bit set > > > is written, > > > pciehp_probe() > > > pcie_init_notification() > > > pcie_enable_notification() > > > pcie_do_write_cmd() > > > > > > to begin with, ctrl->slot_ctrl = 0 in pciehp_isr() as this is only set once the > > write > > > is returned. > > > > > > Or else I am missing something here. Please take a look and let me know. > > > > Thanks for the detailed report and analysis. I think you are right and > > the ctrl->slot_ctrl is only set after the actual value has been > > programmed to the hardware, so if there was interrupt "pending" it will > > trigger immediately (just to find ctrl->slot_ctrl == 0). > > > > I wonder if the following change helps here? > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > > b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > > index 7dd443aea5a5..cd9eae650aa5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c > > @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, > > u16 cmd, > > slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask); > > ctrl->cmd_busy = 1; > > smp_mb(); > > + ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl; > > Actually I tried this one, but it doesn't help in this case as the initial > pcie_capability_read_word() returns the slot_ctrl without > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE > bit set. It looks to me pcie_enable_notification() function enables this, > > if (!pciehp_poll_mode) > cmd |= PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE; > > I don't know this is as per the spec or not as the initial cap read doesn't seems > to > have the PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE bit set. Hang on..I think this should work as you are setting the ctrl->slot_ctrl after updating it with the cmd | mask. I will try this and report back. Thanks, Shameer > Thanks, > Shameer > > > pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, slot_ctrl); > > ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies; > > - ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl; > > > > /* > > * Controllers with the Intel CF118 and similar errata advertise > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxarm mailing list > Linuxarm@huawei.com > http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm