Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:07:35 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] at24: remove
Message-ID: <20181113140734.GA970@kunai>
References: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Bartosz,

Thanks for keeping at this!

> for the next release Sekhar would pick up 14-24, provide an immutable
> branch for me and I'd merge the final patch for at24 and send it upstream
> through Wolfram's i2c tree (maybe we could even delay the i2c PR in the
> merge window to avoid the immutable branch altogether).

But we want linux-next coverage. So, I think an immutable branch makes
sense.

   Wolfram


--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=//jv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--