Subject: Re: file system technical comparisons
From: Stewart Smith <stewart@flamingspork.com>
To: Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <3FF5E4CE.60606@is-cs.com>
References: <3FF5E4CE.60606@is-cs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bA/a2mUNP7jXZeC+SdL5"
Message-Id: <1073676726.7366.3.camel@faith>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 06:32:06 +1100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1334
Lines: 40


--=-bA/a2mUNP7jXZeC+SdL5
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

http://www.flamingspork.com/honors/

I did some (theoretical) comparisons between a number of file systems in
my Honors thesis. Notable exceptions are NTFS and JFS. Some good
reasoning behind why some designs are better than others.

On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 08:38, Steve Glines wrote:
> I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems.=20
> At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs=20
> and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all=20
> supported file systems.
>=20
> Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list.
>=20
> Thanks

--=-bA/a2mUNP7jXZeC+SdL5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA//wG23tgLgERgy8oRAqiwAJ9B5+o1qTP/zrdtpSjXUEDxM+gTZQCgyc8p
2ajDIagOreqHxw7bF8KJ5dg=
=WoB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-bA/a2mUNP7jXZeC+SdL5--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/