Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp5536735imu; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:02:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5d3qnYa2VxLCI0D4/se2nCPz8SPYtzSNtETv1GabPfPJsoHIkRwPLaopYKN1ql/ij/yjm73 X-Received: by 2002:a65:47ca:: with SMTP id f10mr5411604pgs.166.1542124977441; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:02:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542124977; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OOG+2BVok7sdhQQKfTBGFzsH6E4Nzk8kdumy2V8uuNTdsdtuN3Kc3X50191trQpJ/m /RF0rAYMYPiJhpMuQ4Tr9fYWbSYVQ0z23bT4F18rLA4HXzOV/LsdWSdJFwAfPyMjq/nh tJOQax4M/xIfM3Z6QBeAcUMf9omG/62VqvbSR+jOKcJ5yxvta8G8rWuOBrUh83N4UNne nBOvtQV7JKrEx9S8gZZcG4noAhuOTqiFZnDMLgu+2yd0CwcPeNKuVLawsbpYzw7WvVl3 VoXHPVKGUCiw2RESK2JhJuemDOr7wLRuZnd36Y8KT9pSWjSYAMrR+L25WjKs0/jgcdCn sx0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=KfcFJlB16rQaypxgzusbfGdg3KoByqcdAL9OjZLvtCc=; b=msyinl0RTje7niAj9nPJNrZvZqlV1p58TtVVl7+iC28aAA4u/LCsvlDkZbmg3+MH+S K1VhTCE7m0X6kpiPyisQoXWB0vvxu//rRF6K9l9VWIb38gL7Wmza6a4zyyORiIZ8PrIl TphqpPOUb10QhWq9iivHUtsDEPcOitp321kSlmH/CZtHez+IDvz3tGFs35QqxhkXcAFN Rv4skrubZXuku/v2sPT517Fzp5SaBw1C9uYxw9AuxlCT5pinnBSsSytxiE/FBExKfIq6 Eb/j8gwsripn07aLOhmgK/Jz41+m6RIdpa8SjBA+KupObFJAPfp05WQ0UAP2AEoEw7nk lWLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=U+oU4wQt; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 63-v6si17969916plf.18.2018.11.13.08.02.30; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=U+oU4wQt; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388092AbeKNB7c (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:59:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:36576 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387892AbeKNB7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:59:31 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id z17-v6so5890795pgv.3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:00:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KfcFJlB16rQaypxgzusbfGdg3KoByqcdAL9OjZLvtCc=; b=U+oU4wQthSbc+UeFiSd8P57bjJJiwztl6InMPzE/Tp2nyCtJWxypnppeNLngegp7ax HuZpsRDl90I+mUe79qfT+eDLfjIJQREO2j49USPdY0Wu4uYpyXgIu2cDjrF7bPJXXcsl 8GvS+nYge80e8oa3OOpndIPOuqdvg6AWgH63o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KfcFJlB16rQaypxgzusbfGdg3KoByqcdAL9OjZLvtCc=; b=S5cQE1YY00TQPSIHosCCeGWLu4PmHtxju2sw7Yw2919avLwCUOzIo64Rr9ND0Tm0MK qfrET+JNRdtIggP+sYkb4O3n0rGqfktN8Hoz/iHmP6DBABA/49HYYf6YzopbCSRnedN4 qxuVPcxt5tZsDzIjZvD+UJak047d86FmGkc/aDMhuLTX6S5Mcz/qy5BLgEkJpbnldy9F /zxIJTR4Tg77T8z3GLBPSYv0gBZgJziuQQgly1h/WLnHTkbHA/tF573VZOp4LZRMl59w w4nRaxuMAuQglOA2gyGrYR3h3pFMk/XHQJEFANKrMJ20eQcnsVWOUocaF/z8QTaiD5Ly +YWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL/jjJGMiIrB8ZNbzSd3LcggE+uxNdfgTHNnZNcIbKSGWvetR4d K20LOJVPiJvrm7fs3G+SujYHnQwfZFopB4jzV6H5LQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5bc7:: with SMTP id p190-v6mr5723748pfb.175.1542124849312; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:00:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181106064206.17535-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <20181106064206.17535-3-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> In-Reply-To: <20181106064206.17535-3-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> From: Nicolas Boichat Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:00:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/11] clk: mediatek: add new clkmux register API To: weiyi.lu@mediatek.com Cc: Matthias Brugger , sboyd@codeaurora.org, Rob Herring , jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com, fan.chen@mediatek.com, linux-arm Mailing List , lkml , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, owen.chen@mediatek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu wrote: > > From: Owen Chen > > On both MT8183 & MT6765, there add "set/clr" register for > each clkmux setting, and one update register to trigger value change. > It is designed to prevent read-modify-write racing issue. > The sw design need to add a new API to handle this hw change with > a new mtk_clk_mux/mtk_mux struct in new file "clk-mux.c", "clk-mux.h". > > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu > --- > drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c | 252 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h | 101 +++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile > index 844b55d2770d..b97980dbb738 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > -obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MEDIATEK) += clk-mtk.o clk-pll.o clk-gate.o clk-apmixed.o clk-cpumux.o reset.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MEDIATEK) += clk-mtk.o clk-pll.o clk-gate.o clk-apmixed.o clk-cpumux.o reset.o clk-mux.o > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797) += clk-mt6797.o > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797_IMGSYS) += clk-mt6797-img.o > obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6797_MMSYS) += clk-mt6797-mm.o > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..18bc9a146be0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c > @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc. > + * Author: Owen Chen > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "clk-mtk.h" > +#include "clk-mux.h" > + > +static inline struct mtk_clk_mux > + *to_mtk_clk_mux(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + return container_of(hw, struct mtk_clk_mux, hw); > +} > + > +static int mtk_clk_mux_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 mask = BIT(mux->gate_shift); > + > + regmap_update_bits(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, mask, 0); > + > + return 0; Might as well return regmap_update_bits(...). > +} > + > +static void mtk_clk_mux_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 mask = BIT(mux->gate_shift); > + > + regmap_update_bits(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, mask, mask); > +} > + > +static int mtk_clk_mux_enable_setclr(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 val; > + > + val = BIT(mux->gate_shift); > + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_clr_ofs, val); > + > + return 0; ditto: return regmap_write(...) . > +} > + > +static void mtk_clk_mux_disable_setclr(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 val; > + > + val = BIT(mux->gate_shift); > + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_set_ofs, val); > +} > + > +static int mtk_clk_mux_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 val = 0; No need to init to 0. > + > + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val); > + > + return ((val & BIT(mux->gate_shift)) == 0) ? 1 : 0; Just (val & BIT(mux->gate_shift)) != 0. Or more simply val & BIT(mux->gate_shift). > +} > + > +static u8 mtk_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); > + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0); > + u32 val; > + > + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val); > + val = (val >> mux->mux_shift) & mask; > + > + if (val >= num_parents || val >= U8_MAX) val > U8_MAX, technically. > + return -ERANGE; This looks wrong, -34 will be cast to an u8 and appear to be valid... > + > + return val; > +} > + > +static int mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_lock(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0); > + u32 val; > + unsigned long flags = 0; No need to init to 0. > + > + if (mux->lock) > + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags); > + else > + __acquire(mux->lock); > + > + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val); > + val = (val & mask) >> mux->mux_shift; > + > + if (val != index) { > + val = index << mux->mux_shift; > + regmap_update_bits(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, mask, val); > + } What's the point of doing read/compare/update? Are there side effects if you just write the value unconditionally? > + > + if (mux->lock) > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags); > + else > + __release(mux->lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_setclr_lock(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mux = to_mtk_clk_mux(hw); > + u32 mask = GENMASK(mux->mux_width - 1, 0); > + u32 val, orig; > + unsigned long flags = 0; > + > + if (mux->lock) > + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags); > + else > + __acquire(mux->lock); > + > + regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->mux_ofs, &val); > + orig = val; Just read into &orig above. > + val &= ~(mask << mux->mux_shift); > + val |= index << mux->mux_shift; Maybe this is more readable? val = orig & ~(mask << mux->mux_shift) | (index << mux->mux_shift) > + > + if (val != orig) { > + val = (mask << mux->mux_shift); > + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_clr_ofs, val); I'd just regmap_write(..., mask << mux->mux_shift), instead if overriding val. > + val = (index << mux->mux_shift); > + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->mux_set_ofs, val); > + > + if (mux->upd_shift >= 0) > + regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->upd_ofs, > + BIT(mux->upd_shift)); > + } > + > + if (mux->lock) > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags); > + else > + __release(mux->lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_ops = { > + .get_parent = mtk_clk_mux_get_parent, > + .set_parent = mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_lock, > +}; > + > +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops = { > + .get_parent = mtk_clk_mux_get_parent, > + .set_parent = mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_setclr_lock, > +}; > + > +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_ops = { > + .enable = mtk_clk_mux_enable, > + .disable = mtk_clk_mux_disable, > + .is_enabled = mtk_clk_mux_is_enabled, > + .get_parent = mtk_clk_mux_get_parent, > + .set_parent = mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_lock, > +}; > + > +const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops = { > + .enable = mtk_clk_mux_enable_setclr, > + .disable = mtk_clk_mux_disable_setclr, > + .is_enabled = mtk_clk_mux_is_enabled, > + .get_parent = mtk_clk_mux_get_parent, > + .set_parent = mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_setclr_lock, > +}; > + > +struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux, > + struct regmap *regmap, > + spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + struct mtk_clk_mux *mtk_mux = NULL; Not necessary to init to NULL. > + struct clk_init_data init; > + struct clk *clk; > + > + mtk_mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mtk_mux), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mtk_mux) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + init.name = mux->name; > + init.flags = (mux->flags) | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT; mux->flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT > + init.parent_names = mux->parent_names; > + init.num_parents = mux->num_parents; > + init.ops = mux->ops; > + > + mtk_mux->regmap = regmap; > + mtk_mux->name = mux->name; > + mtk_mux->mux_ofs = mux->mux_ofs; > + mtk_mux->mux_set_ofs = mux->set_ofs; > + mtk_mux->mux_clr_ofs = mux->clr_ofs; > + mtk_mux->upd_ofs = mux->upd_ofs; > + mtk_mux->mux_shift = mux->mux_shift; > + mtk_mux->mux_width = mux->mux_width; > + mtk_mux->gate_shift = mux->gate_shift; > + mtk_mux->upd_shift = mux->upd_shift; > + > + mtk_mux->lock = lock; > + mtk_mux->hw.init = &init; > + > + clk = clk_register(NULL, &mtk_mux->hw); > + if (IS_ERR(clk)) { > + kfree(mtk_mux); > + return clk; > + } > + > + return clk; > +} > + > +int mtk_clk_register_muxes(const struct mtk_mux *muxes, > + int num, struct device_node *node, > + spinlock_t *lock, > + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data) > +{ > + struct regmap *regmap; > + struct clk *clk; > + int i; > + > + if (!clk_data) > + return -ENOMEM; Is this check necessary? After all you know who the callers are and maybe you need to be careful not to call this with NULL clk_data? > + > + regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(node); > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) { > + pr_err("Cannot find regmap for %pOF: %ld\n", node, > + PTR_ERR(regmap)); > + return PTR_ERR(regmap); > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > + const struct mtk_mux *mux = &muxes[i]; > + > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->clks[mux->id])) { A NULL check seems enough, as you'll never assign a PTR_ERR(..) value into clk_data->clks[mux->id]. > + clk = mtk_clk_register_mux(mux, regmap, lock); > + > + if (IS_ERR(clk)) { > + pr_err("Failed to register clk %s: %ld\n", > + mux->name, PTR_ERR(clk)); > + continue; Are we ok with returning 0 even though some of these calls failed? > + } > + > + clk_data->clks[mux->id] = clk; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ff0276bb771c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h > @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc. > + * Author: Owen Chen > + */ > + > +#ifndef __DRV_CLK_MUX_H > +#define __DRV_CLK_MUX_H > + > +#include > + > +struct mtk_clk_mux { > + struct clk_hw hw; > + struct regmap *regmap; > + > + const char *name; > + > + u32 mux_set_ofs; > + u32 mux_clr_ofs; > + u32 mux_ofs; > + u32 upd_ofs; > + > + u8 mux_shift; > + u8 mux_width; > + u8 gate_shift; > + u8 upd_shift; > + > + spinlock_t *lock; > +}; > + > +struct mtk_mux { > + int id; > + const char *name; > + const char * const *parent_names; > + unsigned int flags; > + > + u32 mux_ofs; > + u32 set_ofs; > + u32 clr_ofs; > + u32 upd_ofs; > + > + u8 mux_shift; > + u8 mux_width; > + u8 gate_shift; > + u8 upd_shift; > + > + const struct clk_ops *ops; > + > + signed char num_parents; > +}; > + > +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_ops; > +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops; > +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_ops; > +extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops; > + > +#define GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \ > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \ > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) { \ > + .id = _id, \ > + .name = _name, \ > + .mux_ofs = _mux_ofs, \ > + .set_ofs = _mux_set_ofs, \ > + .clr_ofs = _mux_clr_ofs, \ > + .upd_ofs = _upd_ofs, \ > + .mux_shift = _shift, \ > + .mux_width = _width, \ > + .gate_shift = _gate, \ > + .upd_shift = _upd, \ > + .parent_names = _parents, \ > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), \ > + .flags = _flags, \ > + .ops = &_ops, \ > + } > + > +#define MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \ > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \ > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags) \ > + GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \ > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \ > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, \ > + mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops) > + > +#define MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \ > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \ > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd) \ > + MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, \ > + _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, \ > + _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, \ > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) > + > +struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux, > + struct regmap *regmap, > + spinlock_t *lock); > + > +int mtk_clk_register_muxes(const struct mtk_mux *muxes, > + int num, struct device_node *node, > + spinlock_t *lock, > + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > + > +#endif /* __DRV_CLK_MUX_H */ > -- > 2.18.0 >