Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:01:28 +0100
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, hns@goldelico.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
        marcel@holtmann.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH RFC] bluetooth: add uart h4 devices via
 serdev/devicetree
Message-ID: <20181113170128.0f59ef0e@kemnade.info>
In-Reply-To: <CABGGisxsdv+BTd5-HMzF8asEcWtL5F4CMzmkrBCwK=NibvqjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181110232034.17277-1-andreas@kemnade.info>
        <20181111024648.7rt7rlhaqihtqecv@earth.universe>
        <20181112215812.18ebca35@aktux>
        <2C74C837-A6D3-47C9-BE59-CCA594289B94@goldelico.com>
        <20181112222726.73m2oca7hankvcjs@earth.universe>
        <CABGGisxsdv+BTd5-HMzF8asEcWtL5F4CMzmkrBCwK=NibvqjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_/j5HQM3BtDpk6Uv4sir_Rhdt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/j5HQM3BtDpk6Uv4sir_Rhdt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:17:38 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:27 PM Sebastian Reichel
> <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:19:02PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: =
=20
> > > > Am 12.11.2018 um 21:59 schrieb Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.inf=
o>:
> > > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:46:48 +0100
> > > > Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> wrote: =20
> > > >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:20:34AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: =
=20
> > > >>> This is a first try to be able to use h4 devices specified in
> > > >>> the devicetree, so you do not need to call hciattach and
> > > >>> it can be automatically probed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Of course, proper devicetree bindings documentation is
> > > >>> missing. And also you would extend that by regulator/
> > > >>> enable gpio settings.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But before proceeding further it should be checked if the
> > > >>> general way of doing things is right.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > > >>> --- =20
> > > >>
> > > >> Patch looks good to me, just one note
> > > >> =20
> > > > I found one thing myself:
> > > > Shouldn't we have a generic compatible string like "generic-h4".
> > > > ehci-platform.c has for example:
> > > >        { .compatible =3D "generic-ehci", }, =20
> > >
> > > There might be differences in h4 compatible devices (e.g. default
> > > baud rate) so that I would not bet there a "generic-h4" suffices
> > > in the long run. =20
>=20
> It will not because that doesn't define clocks, resets, gpios,
> supplies, etc. and the interactions of all those.
>=20
well, we need a simple supply being on when the device is on.
Nothing more.

> > My suggestion is to use this in DT:
> >
> > compatible =3D "wi2wi,w2cbw003-bluetooth", "<something generic>";
> >
That would be my slight preference here.

> > The driver can start with supporting just the generic compatible
> > string. If somebody finds some incompatible differences, the driver
> > can add a custom handler for the wi2wi chip without breaking DT
> > ABI. =20
>=20
> Any idea how many H4 devices there are? Somehow I doubt there are that
> many to be unmanageable.
>=20
Well, many devices are h4 devices with some more or less important
vendor-specific commands. Well, "hciattach any" uses simple h4 protocol.

those firmware download commands and they have their own drivers.
Most devices I had used bluetooth uart from the command line with, were
simple enough. The other question is whether those devices will run a
modern kernel.

No strong opinion here.=20

Regards,
Andreas

--Sig_/j5HQM3BtDpk6Uv4sir_Rhdt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/9mK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/j5HQM3BtDpk6Uv4sir_Rhdt--