Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6006160imu; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:35:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dDFURO4oPNugpah2wFty9IO2dWHG5sT4jc0xOMvdIpncRlx2NVuM6BoFjI3ggSvtRGzfvz X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8346:: with SMTP id z6mr402154pln.340.1542152112595; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:35:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542152112; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nLHsb+618puxH6j8l8/ka3g22ONQob6qVRnQFcR3QnhfaodcUw2or1/1AOskVvZ/F4 KXEhTjXMJBuiBmNqVtZvooFH6OUuZCseA6pfJJU7X2hqO3Bm9m6KFBFL+GLkTRMwsPq/ 4LyIs1M/n2tFGjq/IJ8aAbUeydJmmSjl0fzCcWeFVnpqTPP7ccSYOkdsM2dDP4gt9WJO w7u3duamu05cbTAzFbcLBiE52uR4bKbp4F8dCnKwCxuybB99BJCqFW/6I8cceJA3NOXB igtS3e4ho7dD+ZFAFq2k08OLXVMao+s6HjPlmBM4BM8eISgRds86vtGkR9SWib9NpU/S uNBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=nWq7ef/SjtP3Gjl4njFZ9w5AGVsDZlza+6bcQVEdBmo=; b=p17HYPKRV+xYNS0I8ONfU55a2W1p3P1Xp+h695MZV1g2C1Hq/9smWgo7JW6NMwEmbo NUUkL6O6eDDo/99igvejpWnvDOVC5NV+X6bLG2euxEBUdPvMUaZhpBu/N/TM1EyPzSht hXiSwgIWJPd3v8Ep5odEOwwemQQZcuMclLLczHtMnWKKeHXMHN0ZDieulTsdvtiCHK4q V2eez/kapQlsk2qNzN3hVypgF6wjvN9fe5iHhYKBF3hj7PJh7zRWWFxO/yXa4ZounGb4 B+vqs95gu8ApEtBZJt9sU37zvq4DRHs/LV9DBe3qAkpNGtNqMgAdilPGczz1ONwa5A0v RnwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=l9YbYQJP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21-v6si21691068plo.89.2018.11.13.15.34.57; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=l9YbYQJP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728129AbeKNJfH (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:35:07 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:44551 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726408AbeKNJfH (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:35:07 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so12431749lji.11 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:34:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nWq7ef/SjtP3Gjl4njFZ9w5AGVsDZlza+6bcQVEdBmo=; b=l9YbYQJPpD7fgJbCOLN2zWtgXnjjwFd9VEMVW+VTrstBBBtdtIl92+3X2H4pGfzRYy yAAm+nFqBpU8XYZxZK5shpIn9mSW6BPuMbkPrnqeAgAIssTI25aWcNXKP2DEDZBYlKyl hbjh3YHWRp6nDXpmw1pwZQMLK0Q1eyhtyGfHVReXsuY6E7LZfkUcR39Yci9rI7WpbWuY ujNHM+X9sNEDVpJ8gItvUkq4XfWE/sJdpA2z0JQx5d28hqFZ+hggtt8SDAwmze2QsUxe A7VtvIWWeHEPe63iMKt5tuS2j48SA6mU4tcbnTSeGrtqYLoR4sOMw+HSNQUXraglCuiD ureQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nWq7ef/SjtP3Gjl4njFZ9w5AGVsDZlza+6bcQVEdBmo=; b=ORPunrTE21ifmQOhzatKYQPqmpjBOyZYQfbjkOPNSzchyM3df/XEmI29ebuJp6IecH /VsWUfLm4peqFS9x6ge741WqYLT1F1enqgswr7XC6lCfaph7ruz7qN4Gw6DkF78qkxUx l1e3GQSy5xXsw5eArcfvmm+fph/wkoGqq9JSvjNHSnuOC9kzqsQDJ6RR3LY57aDGIZtl wCTfyw0C+Xra38YnKRaMnk4jc6cVZgFlKoJimI7N9ny0+etrAMVGodJ/2BmJxy/KFELd jYc09i8S5QaAiQRsZgyo17e9fHR1APPzIM4SlIvNzvThsQz7UmbG58fDel0dF00QcI1U gWTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIlKON23Lr40Q1IrsClT3mCH8ZnAGKn9QFaCedVknTD19TvaRBr pXzvSY7BEer2eDfehy7+gsfsu1HuUssr0F/xuSSJ X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8605:: with SMTP id a5-v6mr4191188lji.145.1542152069713; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:34:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181029104854.17432-2-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:34:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: add audit support To: palmer@sifive.com Cc: david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:07 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 03:48:53 PDT (-0700), david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com wrote: > > On RISC-V (riscv) audit is supported through generic lib/audit.c. > > The patch adds required arch specific definitions. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov > > --- > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 +++++ > > arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 6 ++++++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++-- > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++ > > 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > index a344980287a5..8e6d404a4ed0 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ config RISCV > > select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER > > select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD > > select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT || !RISCV_ISA_A > > + select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL > > select HAVE_MEMBLOCK > > select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP > > select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h > > index 2c5df945d43c..62c5e9d35596 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h > > @@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ static inline void frame_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs, > > SET_FP(regs, val); > > } > > > > +static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + return regs->a0; > > +} > > + > > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > > > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PTRACE_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h > > index 8d25f8904c00..bba3da6ef157 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > > #ifndef _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H > > #define _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H > > > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > > > @@ -99,4 +100,13 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task, > > memcpy(®s->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), args, n * sizeof(regs->a0)); > > } > > > > +static inline int syscall_get_arch(void) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > + return AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV64; > > +#else > > + return AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV32; > > +#endif > > +} > > + > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > index f8fa1cd2dad9..1c9cc8389928 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > @@ -80,13 +80,19 @@ struct thread_info { > > #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 4 /* restore signal mask in do_signal() */ > > #define TIF_MEMDIE 5 /* is terminating due to OOM killer */ > > #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 6 /* syscall tracepoint instrumentation */ > > +#define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 7 /* syscall auditing */ > > > > #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) > > #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) > > #define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING) > > #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED) > > +#define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) > > +#define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT) > > > > #define _TIF_WORK_MASK \ > > (_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) > > > > +#define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK \ > > + (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT) > > + > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_THREAD_INFO_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > index fa2c08e3c05e..2a6c2e7aaff3 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ handle_syscall: > > REG_S s2, PT_SEPC(sp) > > /* Trace syscalls, but only if requested by the user. */ > > REG_L t0, TASK_TI_FLAGS(tp) > > - andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE > > + andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_enter > > check_syscall_nr: > > /* Check to make sure we don't jump to a bogus syscall number. */ > > @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ ret_from_syscall: > > REG_S a0, PT_A0(sp) > > /* Trace syscalls, but only if requested by the user. */ > > REG_L t0, TASK_TI_FLAGS(tp) > > - andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE > > + andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit > > > > ret_from_exception: > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > index 818ae690ab79..d0e037a96a7b 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > @@ -399,6 +399,8 @@ enum { > > /* do not define AUDIT_ARCH_PPCLE since it is not supported by audit */ > > #define AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64 (EM_PPC64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT) > > #define AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE (EM_PPC64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) > > +#define AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV32 (EM_RISCV|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) > > +#define AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV64 (EM_RISCV|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) > > #define AUDIT_ARCH_S390 (EM_S390) > > #define AUDIT_ARCH_S390X (EM_S390|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT) > > #define AUDIT_ARCH_SH (EM_SH) > > I can't seem to figure out how to dig the rest of the thread out of my inbox > (I'm in an airport), so I'm just replying here. > > I've added this to next-audit, which will soon filter into for-next. I'm not > sure if this is 100% settled, but I can't find any issues with it so I think > it's best to get this out for testing. If you RISCV guys are happy, and it is passing the audit-testsuite (which I believe it is based on some brief discussions with David on Freenode), then I think it is okay from my point of view. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com