Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6083097imu; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fukumEnpt459w5BhZOC181SP5/M+yhUHFbc1JX2UkVCglkGYmP0CpeD7DcVfKxzY6R2/Zx X-Received: by 2002:a63:5d55:: with SMTP id o21mr6727454pgm.92.1542157781659; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542157781; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ugGE9XVvWh00ip1s5otPKqapek8MWMrqZIeJmeva/QQ4HBT/u9Q+SWOYSi+8CUjFtk cby0ndnIHBnZomFBgnKcRIblq4bWExWeObKibJwx47odEYiZHvZ3l3aB4q7c82Mf1a6Z YEdTTWctQDNN4pMldPSqeIyZ4rWRkGCJOAwA6Rw/CLBi4pvRtHih8arvkOlHmk/8cWpJ Ok86TEpGJtLLibTV5NWMTT0yxKwqK1XhY1rcn0l47gBKONpzp+spmBO+pGap1zzPedsk TyLJ/Odc3R9QOoKPNPLIkGUMoK90nLKlBU0YtSkS0dOfxaisLMvnqaQBFUvHkU037nOO sMFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=oq9SkIBabmh+mBDoDozP8rQ3zmT5TdRgAHk3cwyY54o=; b=JpYNdxs4M6IyxIoz89Z/miZZWu40shQcnDskjlf0s99yj6uQXlW1LloglwAf6bA9sG TZkDE8QJ1e/zJz5ve0FqqJf4OCccDJoIkOvvIwKwzUu4kZl/NZtyJGhvAKqnIxvtrz91 gn+BMowU5p3bWTw06GJQ4Aa2dPh+y7APcvES9T818R0xJRQKiPHg/wTOD9IiDBXArMlC 2g6xbPwsXTONMc7hHot1BK9Jmur/ZnKWbvmbbXc0y2d+4mKBja/qgjYI/92U5CnhknIM IHnPLZx4PWgyJLMJa1JxpD5gejyZ/dApU/8vsgw7vfghtzvVbnNPHVEG2ZHMynq1RocO YvNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Oh/DgIsf"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d25si11968550pgd.88.2018.11.13.17.09.25; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Oh/DgIsf"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728187AbeKNLJ6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:09:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f196.google.com ([209.85.214.196]:38500 "EHLO mail-pl1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726573AbeKNLJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:09:58 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f196.google.com with SMTP id p4-v6so6901987plo.5 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=oq9SkIBabmh+mBDoDozP8rQ3zmT5TdRgAHk3cwyY54o=; b=Oh/DgIsfX72vjRikllWNgiCTPmWM6xhaRpWxExXPxBuSE86jd7dhswuKB2ZkXJcEaU h8mAyKZIXenPVNhnuv1CSeDqVSuuM9v/7mnp2Xh8gDjX84gNGbfwSKLBEDPWWBC7t0jV XQjxgmvULXQOO12QG1fbjYT4J0yLpeVwmK/A9athfLw1ou8GTUKHWwFAF+i+bjdLVkoL 84h8p2p2ybh2jzMTOhlJICHSdCUEFhN+9NIQllVzDl33fQf/HxgHcGEwbwAYdp5wM+ml PgG7EDvkXebEgR63LIi6W0+Cn9ZJtCghVlpMZzqZXkChLQ5GHJ2c5B02dIUtfsSOXbfA DUDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=oq9SkIBabmh+mBDoDozP8rQ3zmT5TdRgAHk3cwyY54o=; b=ogPog8rJuU5+rluYIKinZVJfO5RhrFk0P9MKxuPyjCAOemW3FIjvgWhuIqZ8EwPGzo kdEpTqduckdrhPUBYtErGWKS59XzumoeBimWKs3Zs5qjzbIswheqyihqHl+m6iNRG8bp Rb3NiWvKneoisx27qHwkUfhNp/gjkchZaHmRYk3PwB7a/qYK9OW3eXyzlcN9hIg/yPl9 2NJUBh4D7Oj+eUiSjm5zqd1cnkiwTxTsiG4wpHprYtZwhzv+LVob8qHc5XhFSRTuR71q T/M7l6QmV1FVkONGwwf9vsPKNIVkJOa3RnXq2qd3qXNpfLJBp8mzRV3BVFWNbVxe1EwS qJMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIkYysa3K8vh2dk13Ne02hW8bX0bfc90gGLXS0tvCHFz1dL2GfJ ffz+FeVzsMm7IdlEGV8k3/I= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab83:: with SMTP id f3-v6mr7123841plr.122.1542157745180; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:200c:213f:405e:f087:71ef? ([2001:df0:0:200c:213f:405e:f087:71ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k14sm22762948pgs.52.2018.11.13.17.09.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:09:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] m68k: Drop ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET To: Finn Thain Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen N Chivers , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , John Stultz , linux-m68k , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Philip Blundell , Joshua Thompson References: <74edaee07800f91eb416ab3e72c4670b8ef4bd4e.1541995959.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au> <0054c37f-ef34-e892-ff1d-02968ab529fa@gmail.com> From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <73f75453-ce74-2c13-ba7c-f36f976d4ff7@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:08:56 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Finn, On 14/11/18 11:11 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> Running a recent kernel under ARAnyM shows 40 ns resolution so the Atari >> hardware emulation is a little more complete. >> > You mean, 40 us resolution, right? Sorry, typo. Should have been us of course. > >> Using that for initial tests, I can confirm that timer resolution is >> reduced to 10ms after patch 6, and gets restored to 40ns after applying >> the full series > Thanks for testing! > >> (once clocksource_init runs, that is - the first part of the boot is at >> 10ms resolution only, a regression compared to with use of >> arch_gettimeoffset). >> > Sounds like a theoretical regression (?) > > Is there any need for more precise timers (I mean, better than 40 us) > before clocksource_init runs? I don't think so, given that we can run just fine with 10 ms resolution. > >> Unfortunately, I can't log in at the console with all patches applied. I >> immediately get the 'login timeout exceeded' message. Weird... >> > I didn't see that in my tests... Was this aranym or real hardware or both? ARAnyM only so far. > > Can you also test tree fbf8405cd982 please? > My tests were on c606b5cf902 in case it wasn't clear. I've now seen fbf8405cd982, one moment please ... That one does appear to work - different versions of ARAnyM, and different userland versions though. I'll test that again with the setup that saw c606b5cf902 fail. Cheers,     Michael