Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264901AbUAIWRA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:17:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264902AbUAIWRA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:17:00 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:39665 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264901AbUAIWQ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:16:58 -0500 Message-ID: <3FFF2851.4060501@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:16:49 -0800 From: George Anzinger Organization: MontaVista Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Amit S. Kale" CC: Andrew Morton , jim.houston@comcast.net, discuss@x86-64.org, ak@suse.de, shivaram.upadhyayula@wipro.com, lkml , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: kgdb for x86_64 2.6 kernels References: <000e01c3d476$2ebe03a0$4008720a@shivram.wipro.com> <1073603622.993.353.camel@new.localdomain> <20040108153243.11e45156.akpm@osdl.org> <200401091031.41493.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> In-Reply-To: <200401091031.41493.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1498 Lines: 35 Amit, The base line kgdb code in the mm patches was offered by me. It derives from (a long time ago) a kgdb I got from the RTIA (or was it the RTLINUX) folks. Prio to that, well, your name is on it as well as others. As you may have noted there have been a lot of changes, mostly for the better, I hope. I think we have slightly different objectives in our work. I debug kernels, not drivers, so I am interested in getting into kgdb as early as possible. To this end the current mm patch allows one to put a breakpoint() as the first line of C code in the kernel. This required a few adjustments, such as configuring the I/O port at CONFIG time, for example. I would like for the two versions of kgdb to merge while keeping the features of both. The work on seperating the common code is something I like and, while I never do modules, the automatic module stuff in gdb sound good. May I suggest that we compare and contrast the two versions and take a look at the differences and the overlaps and settle on one way of doing the various things. George -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/