Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANBxJ=EQOt1t=PkLsMvtfB2SbiLMPeGvFxB7SJXf7m3OkcionQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181114180807.6crs7awhvo26ldbr@hawk.localdomain> <CADYN=9Jh10guVNFfhS8XH+RwZAouLJQu7Svg4+Tz3rQDexzDkg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADYN=9Jh10guVNFfhS8XH+RwZAouLJQu7Svg4+Tz3rQDexzDkg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman@mena.vt.edu>
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:23:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CANBxJ=G4xdF8ZOR4zyoX1edNa=jYxk1xrzoi+7Xgcqt9qDoM2w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KVM selftests are failing
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

> > I couldn't reproduce this on a Westmere. Are you sure you're testing
> > a clean compilation? Can you bisect the kernel?
I don't do a make clean normally, but I will do it this time when
bisecting, also I only use shallow
 clones so it will also take some time pulling. Also to note, The arch
I am using is Haswell, I am not
sure if that should make any difference though.
> What would be the difference in CONFIG_* fragments that you both have enabled?

Here is my config file:
https://pastebin.com/fCNV2z8c

Thanks,
-- 
Ahmed,
Junior Researcher, IoT and Cyber Security lab, SmartCI, Alexandria
University, & CIS @  VMI