Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264870AbUAJC2i (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:28:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264881AbUAJC2i (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:28:38 -0500 Received: from gaia.cela.pl ([213.134.162.11]:14863 "EHLO gaia.cela.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264870AbUAJC2e (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:28:34 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:27:35 +0100 (CET) From: Maciej Zenczykowski To: Xavier Bestel cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jesper Juhl , , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking In-Reply-To: <1073694475.6189.176.camel@nomade> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 690 Lines: 19 > > Like binfmt_flat? :) > > .. or even zflat. Not that I'm proud of it, but it can effectively > manage to produce rather compact executables :) Probably one of those two, is this something new? Never heard of either... :) Specs? Min bin file size? If this (one of these) is guaranteed to be in any new kernel (i.e. can't be configed out like a.out) then that would be enough (assuming this flat is slim file size wise). Cheers, MaZe. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/