Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20181112150215.508-1-namit@vmware.com>
 <20181112150215.508-2-namit@vmware.com> <20181113113000.GB4788@gmail.com>
 <40E4E1B4-EF5F-43A1-B42C-C4CF6349FC62@vmware.com>
 <48577A3F-0F76-4CCA-A959-965344D7259F@vmware.com>
 <7ff5de62-d1df-9a67-1c86-497ce00a4de4@deltatee.com>
 <7072A2D8-30F8-45CB-AB0C-B1BE4A30259A@vmware.com>
 <db8293cf-9abc-e899-8f43-6e42039006d9@deltatee.com>
 <521458D7-A27C-4112-81ED-1974EFE96A76@vmware.com>
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Message-ID: <9c1f58b9-6750-bd90-28b6-b00296525c6e@deltatee.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <521458D7-A27C-4112-81ED-1974EFE96A76@vmware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 14/11/18 06:57 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> As long as the argument was *required* to get distcc to work at all, you
> could expect people would figure out an argument is needed. In this case, I
> suspect nobody will ever know about this argument (except you).

I agree with this completely.

> Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the
> Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly.

Yeah, that's probably a sensible way forward.

> Anyhow, I’ll add an argument as you asked, and let Ingo (& others) be the

An argument to force it to a regular compile would at least help with
experimenting with this stuff.

Logan