Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7565818imu; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:37:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c0LikL8RH3IwfbTnyhPPs8qHxX/truLB3WPJwcuYP+SpsL1emdTT7shjw9v+dRZvtO5f66 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:50e3:: with SMTP id c32-v6mr4716524plj.39.1542256679818; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:37:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542256679; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ufqfwykXgIuXsmldm1YWawLQiVJVqhhKIld2TXA4xNOTdkNSZ7IklfluCezhiaMU7L sWKsiyPNIyBe31N67cBsU2uq15ZT9hNEWhXcGj8HJExHI+Omh1JPzIfJ9bPH8MUTRA4K 7pakDXuev/1cUqwGxKUPyMIWj6hgdVCPb0hrac8SL2M525DyS1A5TSPQKu2jp2aMwPLn V9YwHEXaKDm+CJREaSQi7WVKF5CYnX/yebD8mOA8deLRTKp2WXYktvLZ+JjSeXQL5Aag PoIRr0rA7Di3Url6IINoStGSDeRMLiqk96RLmhtsGOEguI7B5IVIZ4QVJYpHdBESmdJc hxDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=6ILyEn0vEGA9cDmDLjp/qZFCsDtgCFr2VDSXycK5iQE=; b=XVmbL75ucVZP9k/BYDlgPFmUmE6kx+ZklmPRtu4ZmariZvbYRTOTag4d4K0/s+xers hIdeLVtmwT47Wz3qT/hgwlg0rrmFuCvpgkyOPj9Y4H7ig1qGqhxMNJ6SeS0leeMfB00z 0s5Z0JFrialRSNd2ExTByLZEsC0GKyVS2HuTV8lkql4UvlxrMTS5HdRyIHv2UjQlKRzn VnuvanqaFwOB6A1lwZG0/02Q2bS+2c3TWRSHCgEuu8KzlGtUVJaCCwxgTpd7zxm/VsZY ORjrWJOtq2BIRbn/AGeBj0GtkcYFvRWSKsA7mM6uzKv+LJ4FrXqnxddO/5aaCGVvOLYZ mOhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q76-v6si20085700pfa.211.2018.11.14.20.37.45; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:37:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728280AbeKOOnV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:43:21 -0500 Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au ([98.124.60.144]:47526 "EHLO kvm5.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726811AbeKOOnU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:43:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kvm5.telegraphics.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA951272C2; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:37:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:37:02 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Michael Schmitz cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen N Chivers , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , John Stultz , linux-m68k , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Philip Blundell , Joshua Thompson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] m68k: Drop ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET In-Reply-To: <459ad559-99bd-0196-13f4-80440cd39671@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <74edaee07800f91eb416ab3e72c4670b8ef4bd4e.1541995959.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au> <0054c37f-ef34-e892-ff1d-02968ab529fa@gmail.com> <73f75453-ce74-2c13-ba7c-f36f976d4ff7@gmail.com> <459ad559-99bd-0196-13f4-80440cd39671@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi Finn, > > On 14/11/18 3:58 PM, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Hi Finn, > > > > Am 14.11.2018 um 14:08 schrieb Michael Schmitz: > > > > Can you also test tree fbf8405cd982 please? > > > > > > > My tests were on c606b5cf902 in case it wasn't clear. I've now seen > > > fbf8405cd982, one moment please ... > > > > > > That one does appear to work - different versions of ARAnyM, and > > > different userland versions though. I'll test that again with the setup > > > that saw c606b5cf902 fail. > > > > Still fails on that emulator / userland. > > > Must be a quirk of ARAnyM 1.0.2 (or powerpc). With 0.9.15 on x86_64, it's > fine. > Could be a regression in aranym? Maybe it's worth trying 0.9.15 on the powerpc host? > I'm sufficiently convinced to try this on actual hardware now. > Thanks! -- > Cheers, > > ??? Michael > > >