Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7589085imu; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:11:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cp5wwM90E2iF/iPLCTfQX7b0gtet3GtCSRi4aTY874/PeyHprLnu3NmJd60TA7M46PYrW4 X-Received: by 2002:a62:1709:: with SMTP id 9mr4874374pfx.249.1542258693454; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:11:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542258693; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vfv+XBzLZPL8mt65v2RgyYSn2ycMSEGJM/1+D5PyLPyteoTOxscia5zK7Xsrnh5h82 V6D86vQj8b2tPBtctSJthGuS6+XEwNVGCtJ4QsSrmvfnvdenxGo7BbBd7pVF2TkZBhCT 28CD9vCYJkV/+a6TAK2KklOAIOD614X0x0UyrRkysrr0V97C6DUXmV143sFiPLTQzxl/ dKEVvBCJ3YwXSZ3cNZ4igT+tDYOA6hVJ/mAp6izVgk6p6lbRGohay/Ifwhbktt6dwB9F enKBWKahhf6zmUYVNh+kmAqU9IBo2RTdcErn+s7vwqOXhMrpJ4KPLRlUyyk8bU0znoPV qrbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Dj18I9NgAFGZ03drE/bOmYJxS45rf1Sj7UK4m9cqTRU=; b=eJP1shMOO7zlu1Ibjp035orVDl4+3E+WTQeUYVkqqaArabokfE5mdu8Cr1nnlM2CUm BW0RBd7cyS/mNmdNYghqqcmVJmk3HDEfq2wYYL1f/+lXU+kdDmkSfVSh8Mjf3uGlLQzw klg5vjtxN8mvPkLNkR7Yw5T6tJnHzgRoTK3Dipg4qvfweWtMBXPMIuanfXQCp+EVdFvl AkVB4H33hn0hc6HwmYle3hh3h3vIUJYJ9OAv5hbGa+a2Gw/ebVCE5Mvo5ertJoIPC4Q+ CNegRkTqOUyOySS/ib1jzHYxdewIfJExBJHBEqNctaICtgzQGkMDTDXH+//L3s1Z9vB+ IcvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 92-v6si27919572pli.133.2018.11.14.21.11.18; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727051AbeKOPRB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:17:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44518 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726574AbeKOPRA (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:17:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B968830B64DD; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-8-20.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A925C220; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:10:34 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Michal Hocko Cc: David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aarcange@redhat.com Subject: Re: Memory hotplug softlock issue Message-ID: <20181115051034.GK2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20181114070909.GB2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <5a6c6d6b-ebcd-8bfa-d6e0-4312bfe86586@redhat.com> <20181114090134.GG23419@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181114145250.GE2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20181114150029.GY23419@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181114150029.GY23419@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/14/18 at 04:00pm, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 14-11-18 22:52:50, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 11/14/18 at 10:01am, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > I have seen an issue when the migration cannot make a forward progress > > > because of a glibc page with a reference count bumping up and down. Most > > > probable explanation is the faultaround code. I am working on this and > > > will post a patch soon. In any case the migration should converge and if > > > it doesn't do then there is a bug lurking somewhere. > > > > > > Failing on ENOMEM is a questionable thing. I haven't seen that happening > > > wildly but if it is a case then I wouldn't be opposed. > > > > Applied your debugging patches, it helps a lot to printing message. > > > > Below is the dmesg log about the migrating failure. It can't pass > > migrate_pages() and loop forever. > > > > [ +0.083841] migrating pfn 10fff7d0 failed > > [ +0.000005] page:ffffea043ffdf400 count:208 mapcount:201 mapping:ffff888dff4bdda8 index:0x2 > > [ +0.012689] xfs_address_space_operations [xfs] > > [ +0.000030] name:"stress" > > [ +0.004556] flags: 0x5fffffc0000004(uptodate) > > [ +0.007339] raw: 005fffffc0000004 ffffc900000e3d80 ffffc900000e3d80 ffff888dff4bdda8 > > [ +0.009488] raw: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 000000cb000000c8 ffff888e7353d000 > > [ +0.007726] page->mem_cgroup:ffff888e7353d000 > > [ +0.084538] migrating pfn 10fff7d0 failed > > [ +0.000006] page:ffffea043ffdf400 count:210 mapcount:201 mapping:ffff888dff4bdda8 index:0x2 > > [ +0.012798] xfs_address_space_operations [xfs] > > [ +0.000034] name:"stress" > > [ +0.004524] flags: 0x5fffffc0000004(uptodate) > > [ +0.007068] raw: 005fffffc0000004 ffffc900000e3d80 ffffc900000e3d80 ffff888dff4bdda8 > > [ +0.009359] raw: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 000000cb000000c8 ffff888e7353d000 > > [ +0.007728] page->mem_cgroup:ffff888e7353d000 > > I wouldn't be surprised if this was a similar/same issue I've been > chasing recently. Could you try to disable faultaround to see if that > helps. It seems that it helped in my particular case but I am still > waiting for the final good-to-go to post the patch as I do not own the > workload which triggered that issue. Tried, still stuck in last block sometime. Usually after several times of hotplug/unplug. If stop stress program, the last block will be offlined immediately. [root@ ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/fault_around_bytes 4096