Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:34:12 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        pifang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, aarcange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Memory hotplug softlock issue
Message-ID: <20181115143412.GS2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
References: <20181114145250.GE2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20181114150029.GY23419@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181115051034.GK2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20181115073052.GA23831@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181115075349.GL2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20181115083055.GD23831@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181115131211.GP2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20181115131927.GT23831@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181115133840.GR2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20181115143204.GV23831@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181115143204.GV23831@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/15/18 at 03:32pm, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 15-11-18 21:38:40, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 11/15/18 at 02:19pm, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 15-11-18 21:12:11, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > On 11/15/18 at 09:30am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > It would be also good to find out whether this is fs specific. E.g. does
> > > > > it make any difference if you use a different one for your stress
> > > > > testing?
> > > > 
> > > > Created a ramdisk and put stress bin there, then run stress -m 200, now
> > > > seems it's stuck in libc-2.28.so migrating. And it's still xfs. So now xfs
> > > > is a big suspect. At bottom I paste numactl printing, you can see that it's
> > > > the last 4G.
> > > > 
> > > > Seems it's trying to migrate libc-2.28.so, but stress program keeps trying to
> > > > access and activate it.
> > > 
> > > Is this still with faultaround disabled? I have seen exactly same
> > > pattern in the bug I am working on. It was ext4 though.
> > 
> > After a long time struggling, the last 2nd block where libc-2.28.so is
> > located is reclaimed, now it comes to the last memory block, still
> > stress program itself. swap migration entry has been made and trying to
> > unmap, now it's looping there.
> > 
> > [  +0.004445] migrating pfn 190ff2bb0 failed 
> > [  +0.000013] page:ffffea643fcaec00 count:203 mapcount:201 mapping:ffff888dfb268f48 index:0x0
> > [  +0.012809] shmem_aops 
> > [  +0.000011] name:"stress" 
> > [  +0.002550] flags: 0x1dfffffc008004e(referenced|uptodate|dirty|workingset|swapbacked)
> > [  +0.010715] raw: 01dfffffc008004e ffffea643fcaec48 ffffea643fc714c8 ffff888dfb268f48
> > [  +0.007828] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cb000000c8 ffff888e72e92000
> > [  +0.007810] page->mem_cgroup:ffff888e72e92000
> [...]
> > [  +0.004455] migrating pfn 190ff2bb0 failed 
> > [  +0.000018] page:ffffea643fcaec00 count:203 mapcount:201 mapping:ffff888dfb268f48 index:0x0
> > [  +0.014392] shmem_aops 
> > [  +0.000010] name:"stress" 
> > [  +0.002565] flags: 0x1dfffffc008004e(referenced|uptodate|dirty|workingset|swapbacked)
> > [  +0.010675] raw: 01dfffffc008004e ffffea643fcaec48 ffffea643fc714c8 ffff888dfb268f48
> > [  +0.007819] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cb000000c8 ffff888e72e92000
> > [  +0.007808] page->mem_cgroup:ffff888e72e92000
> 
> OK, so this is tmpfs backed code of your stree test. This just tells us
> that this is not fs specific. Reference count is 2 more than the map
> count which is the expected state. So the reference count must have been
> elevated at the time when the migration was attempted. Shmem supports
> fault around so this might be still possible (assuming it is enabled).
> If not we really need to dig deeper. I will think of a debugging patch.

Yes, faultaround is enabled. Will disable it and test again. Will report
test result.