Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To:     Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc:     Travis Downs <travis.downs@gmail.com>, jolsa@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
        namhyung@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: PEBS level 2/3 breaks dwarf unwinding! [WAS: Re: Broken dwarf unwinding - wrong stack pointer register value?]
References: <2335309.gnWok9HYb4@agathebauer> <31474933.dcNFsqGoRn@agathebauer>
        <CAOBGo4wPeobp90eqZF1apZxHUn-dnh6L3Rpt_=beR49o3XHY7g@mail.gmail.com>
        <6310843.N4ooJGWzKY@agathebauer>
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:00:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <6310843.N4ooJGWzKY@agathebauer> (Milian Wolff's message of "Thu,
        15 Nov 2018 10:10:13 +0100")
Message-ID: <8736s2xj1v.fsf@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> writes:
>
> I agree. I personally like your suggested approach - only add an indication 
> when the IP differs so much that it points to a different function. What do 
> others say to this?

Yes that's fine.

-Andi