Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1542104370-22831-1-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org>
 <1542104370-22831-2-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org> <CAMo8BfJGWgJrsg858nwO_845HQOSMNm4AxEqjEjVsSMZMG1Gzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALxhOnhBN3ibNku5z4ZwnRjnWEtSrsbyVQUDzJkT6U65Ek0H+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALxhOnhBN3ibNku5z4ZwnRjnWEtSrsbyVQUDzJkT6U65Ek0H+g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:45:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfKM0M-f9UNmz0o9qZb9srJn7yxkYVYjqGc84c0eO5jnmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xtensa: add __NR_syscalls along with __NR_syscall_count
To:     Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>
Cc:     Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        y2038@lists.linaro.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
        marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:05 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 05:19, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If we remove __NR_syscall_count from the uapi header I'd
> > suggest dropping it completely and switching its two current
> > users to __NR_syscalls.
>
> I'm not removing the __NR_syscall_count macro; just place it
> in asm/unistd.h file for the above reason.

Ok, I'll apply this series to the xtensa tree and make my cleanups
on top of it.

> FYI, I made sure that the kernel will build with my patch. I would
> appreciate if you can perform the boot test on the actual platform.

I did a simple boot testing on a range of configurations, it works.
I'll also run LTP a bit later.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max