Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp303217imu; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:49:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cGBxP0U5+TiCDHaRb1EuHq/Jz5yE3X+f675flNMFBlPL42Fd0EtdVh3u9OJMJKKMHlH7gi X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:76cc:: with SMTP id j12-v6mr10413800plt.339.1542365392224; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:49:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542365392; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DOvgRyY33dy8+pzKlWjs7/HU2PdgI8YhJl8mCVsL3tREWW0ySb2wlxzaoKIG06kFaF u7+Kajg/cFJQrXafHBToXHuLESORPTKjr2hAZcSmgxRyOIl8/2RIDPxOVfVVECCkjAAJ LR+irvGEBMEYV/xFPME8D8Oxq2Uc2AyRRnIwJftHbwvgyS7oU1YLf3RQw/kDyhdNUYfU hgAsVFHOM9x+S7QEP77iEPQ1TbyLJT4WfheYVGX/Kzi2Or8hmKZS8lfIRAozIQrGrzXp ODZlFgrxp2dccx1NYvG/a4BW3+eVbQuZb9SplLb623q1S1keelP8P3wveH46mfvpTRPV YMqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=8pRRxv+KEfJ6TWyAqxpgIP5nFGvIIimEkjxCPp+Lfhg=; b=Tubsuigogc+M9hnUf+t1nBgeXqv8FybnTEPOkj3defvl9/qRuomi0CCQUDGj2qpZl+ na4Aa4GMI8z9tjTXSE2wJWBXFAiO69tRKIhSk8mElmsoRc+kBag4mM5hO9jLIdbF/34D 1VpPVTzAIoLlvWyUGRu7SHvZFkSTJe5WcXrR70m1YQhTb73kdB2hEh4kdJ5/SQx5cP1e OgyWGn4WeikQC+bME8Ky3rSfHhRD2HynQj3XjL6vAt4jlQTQPY05UefGNd+v0uAy//wJ /bhcbFdw4NFLb9BtOOSBy4wNiAmFl3AN3akYgn6hvy2DHQEHY5HdH7rRJG9P6vYb5C/n IJ2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m33si28731746pgl.379.2018.11.16.02.49.37; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389595AbeKPU7G (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:59:06 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50914 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727490AbeKPU7G (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:59:06 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA11AE24; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1542365221.3020.9.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures From: osalvador To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton Cc: Baoquan He , Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Michal Hocko Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:47:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org> References: <20181116083020.20260-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 09:30 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index a919ba5cb3c8..ec2c7916dc2d 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -7845,6 +7845,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, > struct page *page, int count, > return false; > unmovable: > WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); > + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page"); Would not be enough to just do: dump_page(page, "unmovable page". Unless I am missing something, page should already have the right pfn? <--- unsigned long check = pfn + iter; page = pfn_to_page(check); ---> The rest looks good to me Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador