Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp334230imu; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:20:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eas6azjVqiSUmh7o7+G/DhUGUnFGZktzVRfAKwriNm5WzyA64KnYarQCJdVyqGqU9i0bjf X-Received: by 2002:a62:2c16:: with SMTP id s22-v6mr10526774pfs.6.1542367258499; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:20:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542367258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qNob7zSjcmcQGkbpY0tosz4LMZ7vQzQ5rHzmE/o9q/WCpWYAfD1qcvTvNxy+8C/ykj k6zpX+bqE2tbfxFSPG3Ow4swH8Jlp3K4NHhJHg88gL84vnnRpqCfISxgEabtOY3uPwic pg/IVmYzQibLMQXmlYlKaXknRiNUkgzsTKYzZXF3UDBOJARbcSpIR95YY0n1mQuZ8rwi LUUCCUibiW/kjjat+rs4xqNIYrPtXli+Q6Xv2PFY43MhnXzgqAimeXEaFPVYhUaVoWdv iCBtNLrKmIivOHStKLN34XBLtzmznrbSzOghERcmmlUQSphqw708drkpuwr/zyuTss+5 p3/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=PfQBEdezzslU9zkHoSxZfusd72zFjhQPXwdOjK2UZxA=; b=e3EgS6j/YYw5ZtQv/u5rOLBrRAd+KDVvxxhDwytuifoikK9LZ5FEEhecI+PIudfWwf A7EKEEbakZDMeC5JxtxnCxAvOetvB/Yjkx/D8OFSQ/AYQ/DEpy9DISI7JscDHZh0NYC9 XW0uP2jctHm4ajhUmo7bvr6nQ2y8aQskAg9pDdhAqrEfkZ2RSC1NNB8Rl4ubUx17cNVa wqQAEeXKWPAf8+BUudynNd7MXQtd2fAvonQVNB7VUJ+Mm06zq8CMb2FIoo5pmUZ+PB9I 6NHAaXfL7aMVRA7rtzdLRq0kX2lw3RVru3pJqd+FP7gG6hgxp4ktrp2gsxmKnro1s/A+ 8DIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h68-v6si34001086pfb.142.2018.11.16.03.20.43; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389447AbeKPVbw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:31:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34212 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727715AbeKPVbw (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:31:52 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006FBAF6D; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:19:54 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: osalvador Cc: Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm, memory_hotplug: drop pointless block alignment checks from __offline_pages Message-ID: <20181116111954.GG14706@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181116083020.20260-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20181116083020.20260-4-mhocko@kernel.org> <1542364443.3020.3.camel@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542364443.3020.3.camel@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 16-11-18 11:34:03, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 09:30 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > This function is never called from a context which would provide > > misaligned pfn range so drop the pointless check. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko > > I vaguely remember that someone reported a problem about misaligned > range on powerpc. > Not sure at which stage was (online/offline). > Although I am not sure if that was valid at all. If we are talking about the same thing then this was about partial memblock initialized (aka struct pages were not initialized). > Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs