Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp932929imu; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:38:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dVxVq6ZxP3xhbbwrE3yijJFr9Y9vsUU/A2qzJDK43tSJdSh4u8sdtbSh+xS/3miERumfjB X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f81:: with SMTP id 1-v6mr12312231plz.203.1542400719743; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:38:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542400719; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kZbSA0ZqhXBDiLzY7usWJdSkf+iirsvSBmObj6yw7YMVGo/LmCBrRTSGm7qSBBaWpm 6ln9B9IY5COI2mZWGUXZPRx88+0uW/kSkAsZHXHB/sQnVz6E0GVYfpugXgU0vjs3GEec EkDdvUYqKRnNSJ/0w00EHZYj1bCGVqLeFDyfzz/3MI3GZX3D7KtQFDT0NCY2icoL5gCe LWzGCwDk/uro+10q5reXyOrVsFamUrjZyQrKGmiF4QkPFuqp00L3l8C+DCJX32eFdGfn mAdkSDonm2vCVYIaqjieuqAeOulFatqU9an0IGixkzLO9VwMEN5C07A1mD6Dz7G7DPem HBEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=jym+GiPGYUZbhE7huk9vGUGKNcCOgVAuuLAZaTJxr8w=; b=cSIADgXALO6vRYCXyTGkjXZ28LLql3U0WKo9apTbBg7jTv55fvNcCf1WggCeajyPyU QQ+N1dEqko36P7cDTKqQ1zzmZ4K3R6wapk3w+SYugTc7d6NzIWA5dx2+n+EIhgk+xS9N rvtrj0DmkV5R9SXovc0QIizZte6xq/bAHAjDHZ9wj2sWBIN/C02FE/ea0cgARjuYCtrv YrOxpY3GELL7cPLcaIkx7XcGSMQdII0/QMbAh3FvKkQCbL841ugyVx3RsT9cPgWKDKJX +1Y47tSagZxDujZEyAHnDlLlfjC6sjKSzEuwtsz4JBMWbluPKDIuWU8KVm/O5/375euM yu1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fXi1bkRD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m9-v6si31623514plt.28.2018.11.16.12.38.24; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fXi1bkRD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727585AbeKQGus (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:50:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:33653 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727219AbeKQGus (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:50:48 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f19-v6so1734636wmb.0 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:36:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jym+GiPGYUZbhE7huk9vGUGKNcCOgVAuuLAZaTJxr8w=; b=fXi1bkRDUPmGu5/qBpNYfXoUC57UN+cieUa8Z/CA53QSssmiJvAyYz3Qc1sVqtpk/d rgRxqCWTrAaiCzdFQQ+rXgjXX7kole+QGUo2lqh/4YA1H2EUAgmYrHhmFyRo+dzT5UXH vr3aa4CdN4VZhJD3oS5Ft27fWH271f3FeR9kWSaYH6eVNOsMbln0i9Jhdxd2gK3Bg/pA S0XVc6u00IRswimYOUQbFzmx0wRveRAPoZauPXmEmURTUGEXhvTmdLwPknWY5b27SwXi t981y4bLo878pvODfyCQT1Psl3NT2nh0bs8ly9Yo6a4EwLzh2+w7w4MFU7XzrqR3UR6Z qi7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jym+GiPGYUZbhE7huk9vGUGKNcCOgVAuuLAZaTJxr8w=; b=X5sW5zAq+gL6j6DBaWVDa7WjHqH/47cdR6UIhAcJAKc5MNc8yM6RT4XK2dXGCsYSsy cQPr092QgTTADonJdPRp7tKCGShd9dAk544QKFmTE9ewUHcNuHDtbmBRW3PsXKgLCkDi oCaTkXc2GfgRgVZIXfhwxe3iIDuCvuFdM6Z9smimjjIrjCU6mZklTxRXKcnZqvtUArQz fva8PpCZy4MDDLajgCdnCbmlOE5Pw+zwl5Br9N6HFIWeTcXC3tQMqTdq+As/b4CXPg8U IH3aAJKPtxezwHWxDYOgcw7KcQbPFQXgbBRsE9CH1T2h2e+pj84r22k3vQ4oHOxz7tnV TKRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKfO1Ju2pYpcYiBQzhfnGfwSUNK4HgPadpJPFan+Ys/Jb3mtJvc X1avs7RJzlOkWTp/bK+2XIAb+BIa/yVYu5NC6xcK4BZf X-Received: by 2002:a1c:ac85:: with SMTP id v127mr9392689wme.62.1542400612180; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:36:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <154225759358.2499188.15268218778137905050.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <154225761038.2499188.1270468803677883744.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20181115061036.1575223d@silica.lan> <20181115162008.GO3759@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> In-Reply-To: <20181115162008.GO3759@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> From: Rodrigo Vivi Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:36:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [RFC PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Subsystem Profile To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , dave.jiang@intel.com, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwisler@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:38 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:10:36AM -0800, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:03:11 +0100 > > Geert Uytterhoeven escreveu: > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:06 AM Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Document the basic policies of the libnvdimm subsystem and provide a > > > > first example of a Subsystem Profile for others to duplicate and edit. > > > > > > > > Cc: Ross Zwisler > > > > Cc: Vishal Verma > > > > Cc: Dave Jiang > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/nvdimm/subsystem-profile.rst > > > > > > > +Trusted Reviewers > > > > +----------------- > > > > +Johannes Thumshirn > > > > +Toshi Kani > > > > +Jeff Moyer > > > > +Robert Elliott > > > > > > Don't you want to add email addresses? > > > Only the first one is listed in MAINTAINERS. > > > > IMO, it makes sense to have their e-mails here, in a way that it could > > easily be parsed by get_maintainers.pl. > > I personally think that list of "trusted reviewers" makes more harm than > good. It creates unneeded negative feelings to those who wanted to be in > this list, but for any reason they don't. Those reviewers will feel > "untrusted". I'd like to +1 on this concern here. Besides leaving all the other people demotivated. A small group of trusted reviewers doesn't scale. People will get overloaded. Or you won't be able to enforce that all patches need to get Reviews. Reviews should be coming from everywhere and commiters and maintainers deciding on what to trust or re-review. Also the list is hard to maintain and keep the lists updated. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br