Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 18 Nov 2018 09:32:07 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc:     zohar@linux.ibm.com, david.safford@ge.com, monty.wiseman@ge.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] tpm: ensure that the output of PCR read contains
 the correct digest size
Message-ID: <20181118073207.GC5897@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181114153108.12907-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
 <20181114153108.12907-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
 <20181116134153.GD4163@linux.intel.com>
 <05c7c936-da58-f386-0a43-69e96d6e18a8@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <05c7c936-da58-f386-0a43-69e96d6e18a8@huawei.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:06:48PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 11/16/2018 2:41 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 04:31:07PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > This patch protects against data corruption that could happen in the bus,
> > > by checking that that the digest size returned by the TPM during a PCR read
> > > matches the size of the algorithm passed to tpm2_pcr_read().
> > > 
> > > This check is performed after information about the PCR banks has been
> > > retrieved.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > 
> > Missing fixes tag.
> 
> Before this patch set, tpm2_pcr_extend() always copied 20 bytes from the
> output sent by the TPM.
> 
> Roberto

Aah, right, of course. Well the patch set is ATM somewhat broken because
this would require a fixes tag that points to a patch insdie the patch
set.

Probably good way to fix the issue is to just merge this with the
earlier commit.

/Jarkko