Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 18 Nov 2018 17:03:29 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] at24: remove
Message-ID: <20181118170329.788778a8@bbrezillon>
In-Reply-To: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
References: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:

> As far as merging of this series goes: I'd like to avoid dragging it over
> four releases. The series is logically split into five groups:
> 
> patches 1-2: nvmem and mtd changes
> patches 3-9: davinci arch-specific changes
> patches 10-13: networking changes
> patches 14-24: davinci specific again
> patch 25: final at24 change
> 
> With that I believe we can do the following: Greg KH could pick up the
> first two patches into his char-misc tree.

The char-misc tree? Why not the MTD or NVMEM tree?

> Sekhar would take the second
> group and the third would go through the networking tree since the first
> three sets are not linked in any way. This would be merged for 4.21. Then
> for the next release Sekhar would pick up 14-24, provide an immutable
> branch for me and I'd merge the final patch for at24 and send it upstream
> through Wolfram's i2c tree (maybe we could even delay the i2c PR in the
> merge window to avoid the immutable branch altogether).