Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265790AbUAKGQg (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:16:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265791AbUAKGQg (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:16:36 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:12804 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265790AbUAKGQf (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:16:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:16:29 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Robert Love Cc: jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Laptops & CPU frequency Message-ID: <20040111061629.GF545@alpha.home.local> References: <20040111025623.GA19890@ncsu.edu> <1073791061.1663.77.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073791061.1663.77.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1016 Lines: 24 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:17:41PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > You probably have some issue in your power management scripts - Fedora > should scale the CPU speed back as soon as you remove AC power, not just > at boot if not on AC. I never understood why the speed depends on AC power (except to fake a long autonomy). It would be smarter if it scaled the speed based on CPU usage. It's what I did on my notebook (athlon 1.3G), and I'm happy to run it all the day at 500 MHz and not to hear its stupid CPU fan dancing every minute, and I too am happy to be able to compile a kernel in 3 minutes even on battery, when it would take 10 min at 500 MHz and eat the battery much more, since LCD and disk eat power during 7 more minutes. Just my thought... Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/