Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265789AbUAKHBM (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:01:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265791AbUAKHBM (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:01:12 -0500 Received: from gizmo02ps.bigpond.com ([144.140.71.12]:5571 "HELO gizmo02ps.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265789AbUAKHBJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:01:09 -0500 Mail-Copies-To: never To: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase recursive symlink limit from 5 to 8 Keywords: seem,limit,symlink,path,entities References: <2flllofnvp6.fsf@saruman.uio.no> From: Steve Youngs X-Face: #/1'_-|5_1$xjR,mVKhpfMJcRh8"k}_a{EkIO:Ox<]@zl/Yr|H,qH#3jJi6Aw(Mg@"!+Z"C N_S3!3jzW^FnPeumv4l#,E}J.+e%0q(U>#b-#`~>l^A!_j5AEgpU)>t+VYZ$:El7hLa1:%%L=3%B>n K{^jU_{& Organization: Linux Users - Fanatics Dept. X-URL: X-Request-PGP: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 1659 2093 19D5 C06E D320 3A20 1D27 DB4B A94B 3003 X-Attribution: SY Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:01:01 +1000 In-Reply-To: <2flllofnvp6.fsf@saruman.uio.no> (Petter Reinholdtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:03:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1595 Lines: 42 --=-=-= * Petter Reinholdtsen writes: > Linux: Symlink limit seem to be 6 path entities. > AIX: Symlink limit seem to be 21 path entities. > HP-UX: Symlink limit seem to be 21 path entities. > Solaris: Symlink limit seem to be 21 path entities. > Irix: Symlink limit seem to be 31 path entities. > Mac OS X: Symlink limit seem to be 33 path entities. > Tru64 Unix: Symlink limit seem to be 65 path entities. > I really think this limit should be increased in Linux. Not sure > how high it should go, but from 5 to somewhere between 20 and 64 > seem like a good idea to me. 6 does seem pretty low. What was the reason for setting it there? Is there a downside to increasing it? -- |---------------------| | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. | | The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. | |---------------------------------| --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Eicq - The XEmacs ICQ Client iEYEABECAAYFAkAA9LAACgkQHSfbS6lLMANxNgCgqtU86VhvsxWNftb+pCv/xPCh v4AAoNmWK69DltwQ+ssfuTafS6KSh2Io =vqGu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/