Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2739923imu; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5deAMa4QaFVxBZYo+n56PlWLyR/O6XHbllJsBnVPaPsUNKlGSQJiUCP+aURzRFkEBuM4eYL X-Received: by 2002:a62:3c6:: with SMTP id 189-v6mr22854721pfd.19.1542634044142; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542634044; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q6sw76aV+zr0aDjLNj8xRgsmK7oaKA9/39wViXJfD3f5Yzupz5pGNGvczsORriSU8I bhUMGtUjFCVbZq9LRJmb91mB2Uz0DPsg7wc8UrCVjIGHxa4FErcqcNxXYrBmqFHM8bAV wIp7MTjY5DknCRGsmPRnfrx0h/Owx4RsBQdYb1QVGb2/1OA8c2RAPQZMsujX9nHr0j/P wrlVdLBCpEvk/Ndbx1mt6fqXL/52RVGYFxzeXt1TIngecsDbshYIgTUC6kDbwKcK6lDu 5d7Yzj8PX/nW24enC64m82SABhSWD6NSVrFEq+llEpnJBYpfd8Ll3K+D4IujhPVu0B/+ 1FaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=3ySQ0IPh8RiCHr3Lk/KtQgv0Ls6kuiA2BFD53pz+KqA=; b=rUhOB85ZoZIG5LAqta+fixWqUtWkDcuz6Wq4W+p80SnAwfscI9A0cPc3QIc9StkkVs PP/4AfKuyVH8wqlN4AYUrXUh5cJGRv9SO/1grogNkpbi4T5/hrzdNWMxer/dmGcJ8rME Hkfj2pNXCcEUzIl04D19rkCfKgVDCN4tp6P538kkxMtFzVc1JoyjeO1KqKGmA6XDrv0M 1REPNJRAHytiHltmbfVGlNticMxMgqmcyxD/ZKJ2jJD46nrLU7nZzLvAM74t50H77qBx BuoG47M2dpVu1Zzfxf4cwWbrPh8pYkkl0leEGkxvW45cWC6KByV5MEhLBKl6e9j+jjL8 EBMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v184si37355574pgd.295.2018.11.19.05.27.08; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729330AbeKSXtw (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:49:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45800 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729214AbeKSXtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:49:51 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBA2AD55; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:26:11 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina To: David Herrmann cc: ebiggers@kernel.org, Benjamin Tissoires , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , linux-kernel , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Dmitry Vyukov , Dmitry Torokhov , syzbot+72473edc9bf4eb1c6556@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, stable , Jann Horn , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: uhid: forbid UHID_CREATE under KERNEL_DS or elevated privileges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20181114215509.163600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, David Herrmann wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. I however believe the fix below is more generic, and > > would prefer taking that one in case noone sees any major flaw in that > > I've overlooked. Thanks. > > As Andy rightly pointed out, the credentials check is actually needed. > The scenario here is using a uhid-fd as stdout when executing a > setuid-program. This will possibly end up reading arbitrary memory > from the setuid program and use it as input for the hid-descriptor. Ah, right, that's a very good point indeed; I've overlooked that (valid) concern in the thread. Thanks for spotting that, Andy. I've now applied Eric's patch. Thanks everybody, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs