Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
        Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 128/205] btrfs: tree-checker: Fix misleading group system information
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:27:15 +0100
Message-Id: <20181119162636.801936953@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181119162616.586062722@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181119162616.586062722@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>

commit 761333f2f50ccc887aa9957ae829300262c0d15b upstream.

block_group_err shows the group system as a decimal value with a '0x'
prefix, which is somewhat misleading.

Fix it to print hexadecimal, as was intended.

Fixes: fce466eab7ac6 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static int check_block_group_item(struct
 	    type != (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
 			   BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
 		block_group_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
-"invalid type, have 0x%llx (%lu bits set) expect either 0x%llx, 0x%llx, 0x%llu or 0x%llx",
+"invalid type, have 0x%llx (%lu bits set) expect either 0x%llx, 0x%llx, 0x%llx or 0x%llx",
 			type, hweight64(type),
 			BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA,
 			BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM,