Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265897AbUAKOZi (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:25:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265898AbUAKOZi (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:25:38 -0500 Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:6842 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265897AbUAKOZg (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:25:36 -0500 X-Authenticated: #20450766 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:24:53 +0100 (CET) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Russell King cc: Helge Hafting , Subject: Re: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance In-Reply-To: <20040111135309.F1931@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 21 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell King wrote: > Basically, the SMC91C111 is great for use on small, *well controlled* > embedded networks, but anything else is asking for trouble. Ok, thanks. Well, just out of curiousity (also, why I concluded it might have been a more general problem - because I had it on both my ARM boards) - where is the bottleneck likely to be on a SA system with a Netgear-FA411 PCMCIA card (NE2000-compatible)? Just a slow CPU? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/