Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:32:15 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
CC:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO
 number" to the regulator tree
Message-ID: <20181120153215.GC16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
References: <20180517164120.485F844007E@finisterre.ee.mobilebroadband>
 <CGME20181120134333eucas1p27a19912dddf4b9b34da505e0973c9137@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
 <66d3b74c-0152-b17b-89d4-a21d33445b25@samsung.com>
 <20181120144700.GB16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
 <f1c7e9fe-aa57-c7c4-1c2f-02105a5a7474@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f1c7e9fe-aa57-c7c4-1c2f-02105a5a7474@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> 
> On 2018-11-20 15:47, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:43:32PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> On 2018-05-17 18:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number
> >> This patch causes following kernel warning on Samsung Exynos4412 based
> >> Trats2 board:
> >>
> >> wm8994 4-001a: Failed to get supply 'DBVDD1': -517
> >> wm8994 4-001a: Failed to get supplies: -517
> > How is the wm8994 being registered on this board? I am having
> > difficulty finding a device tree or a board file that relates to
> > the board and includes the wm8994.
> 
> 
> Please check arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts details. The I2C device
> is defined in exynos4412-midas.dtsi, it uses "wlf,wm1811" compatible.
> 

Ok got it, thanks.

> 
> >>> @@ -203,6 +203,18 @@ static const struct i2c_board_info wm1277_devs[] = {
> >>>  	{ I2C_BOARD_INFO("wm8958", 0x1a),  /* WM8958 is the superset */
> >>>  	  .platform_data = &wm8994_pdata,
> >>>  	  .irq = GLENFARCLAS_PMIC_IRQ_BASE + WM831X_IRQ_GPIO_2,
> >>> +	  .dev_name = "wm8958",
> >>> +	},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table wm8994_gpiod_table = {
> >>> +	.dev_id = "i2c-wm8958", /* I2C device name */
> >>> +	.table = {
> >>> +		GPIO_LOOKUP("GPION", 6,
> >>> +			    "wlf,ldo1ena", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> >>> +		GPIO_LOOKUP("GPION", 4,
> >>> +			    "wlf,ldo2ena", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> >>> +		{ },
> >>>  	},
> >>>  };
> > If its being done through a board file I guess you will need the
> > equivalent of this.
> 
> 
> No board file, everything in DT.
> 

This is really weird, because the error in your log relates to
DBVDD1 which is an independent regulator supplied by a separate
regulator. I am really having some difficulty seeing how the
patch interfers. It is definitely that patch which causes the
issue, like you revert it and things work again?

Thanks,
Charles